Monday, February 25, 2013

Home Truths

More than one, actually, in an excellent essay by Walter Russell Mead:

This isn’t just a Catholic crisis. The churches of the so-called Magisterial Reformation are also in trouble: Lutheran, Anglican and Reformed denominations are suffering from the same troubles that afflict the Church of Rome. Many of the problems are familiar elements of the western religious and cultural landscape. Textual criticism has challenged traditional views about the antiquity, accuracy and authority of the scriptures. The social consequences of cheap and easy birth control have opened a rift between traditional religious teachings about human sexuality and the ideas and behavior of many people in the West. The consumer society and the mass media associated with it constantly pull people, perhaps especially young people, away from Christian ideas even as an increasingly secular civil society pushes religion off to the side of the public square. The combination of rapid global communications, explosive church growth in the global South and the deep divide between the conservative social attitudes prevalent in Africa and Asia and the libertarian or even libertine norms of the global North makes it hard for universal institutions to develop a workable set of practices and procedures to cover the whole world.

In America the Catholic Church in particular suffers from another acute problem: as the descendants of the 19th and early 20th century mass migrations of Catholics from countries like Ireland, Poland and Italy move farther away from their roots, they are also moving away from an inherited sense of Catholic identity. The ethnic neighborhoods with their parochial schools and civic associations rooted in and centered on parish churches have been fading away since World War Two; increasingly young American Catholics of European origin are emotionally and culturally distant from the Church of their ancestors. If it weren’t for immigration from majority Catholic countries to our south, the American Catholic Church today would be facing many of the issues of dwindling membership that challenge the mainstream liberal Protestant denominations today.
All of this is true and most of it has happened in my lifetime. There are any number of reasons, but for me one of the key reasons is that the Catholicism that I learned growing up in the 1970s wasn't particularly robust. I mostly attended Catholic schools and had religious education throughout my upbringing, but most of what I got was a pretty thin gruel of vague humanism and feelgood bromides. When I entered the secular world of college, I frankly wasn't very well prepared to talk about my faith and wasn't especially interested in doing so, either. I've only started to truly understand Catholic doctrine in the last 10-12 years. And I have a long way to go.

Mead also makes an important point regarding the abuse scandals that have so eroded the Church's moral authority:

Many Catholics object that in some ways the attention paid to the sex scandals in the Church has been unfair. Certainly much of the commentary about these scandals has been. We have been treated to years of unctuous lectures, for example, about the relationship between the Church’s demands for priestly celibacy and the abuse scandals. Yet the wave of scandal has spread well beyond the Church; pedophilia and coverups have been found everywhere from the Boy Scouts to prominent football teams where celibacy was not an issue. If embarrassed commentators have apologized to Catholics for some of the exaggerated and inaccurate attacks, those apologies have not come to Via Meadia‘s attention. Many who follow press coverage in which these scandals are treated as breaking news have missed the point that much of the activity in question took place decades ago, and the pastoral, low key approach of many Catholic bishops to these cases often reflected what many lay psychologists at the time considered best practice. Loyal Catholics who bristle at the unfairness of this coverage have a point.

But with all caveats and reservations duly noted and filed, and with the anti-Catholic bias of some reporters and commentators duly acknowledged and discounted, the scandals are still horrible enough, and the pattern of response so inept and institutionally protective that the damage to American Catholicism — perhaps especially among the Euro-Catholics who in any case were edging towards the door and who find pedophilia scandals the perfect excuse to leave in a huff — will be profound and historic.

Unfortunately, scandals of this kind have emerged in many countries, undermining the Church at a time of religious questioning and social change. It is very hard for an organization widely seen as protecting pedophiles and relegating women to second class citizenship to get a hearing for a moral agenda that in many ways goes against the wishes of human nature and the spirit of the times.

There's more, a lot more, at the link and it's all worth your time. I suspect the next Pope will be transformative, because change is required. As I've argued for some time, the energy of the Church is in what Mead calls the "global south." And I increasingly suspect that is from where the next pontiff will emerge.

13 comments:

W.B. Picklesworth said...

It's not so much that the church is in trouble, though in some sense it is, it's that our society is in trouble. Contrafactuals can be found, of course, but they don't amount to much in the context of broader suffering. It's great that gays are treated better by society, for instance, but that loses it's shine when that same society is so coarsened that it treats everyone poorly. Humanistic misanthropy is still misanthropy.

Mr. D said...

It's not so much that the church is in trouble, though in some sense it is, it's that our society is in trouble.

I agree with that. And the reason that faith will never completely go away is because secularism is, at bottom, pretty empty. We'll have a revival. It's happened before and it will happen again. Problem is there is going to be a lot of collateral damage along the way.

3john2 said...

The issue is ultimately a personal, not cultural, one - though of course culture affects the individual more than the other way around.

In essence, "religion" should be something you are, not something you do. It is too often taught as a bunch of do's and don'ts instead of whys and wherefores and the net effect is at best a layer of shellac instead of internal framework. The first may resist some temptations/manifestations to some extent, the later creates the impetus for change and direction.

Anonymous said...

Picklesworth's comments are spot on.

Gino said...

as is Crankbait's.

Anonymous said...

HRC in decline. Another Twentieth Century story picking up pace today or simply another unhappy chapter in the unread closeout bin. How can dogma and superstition compete with science and Apple? How can the HRC stir a revival when it alienates it's members so very effectively? (Anyone who's gone to Catholic school knows how well they mint atheists). If the HRC's future lies in the Southern Hemisphere, how long before the Vatican becomes a museum? Within a generation or two's my guess.

Anonymous said...

The future of the United States is one hell of a lot more in doubt than the future of the church or religeon in general. The church and it's followers will endure. Our declining society, perhaps not.

Mr. D said...

One anon says:

If the HRC's future lies in the Southern Hemisphere, how long before the Vatican becomes a museum?

You're missing half the story. The energy of the Church is in the Southern Hemisphere, but that doesn't mean the energy can't travel back to the North. As it becomes more obvious that the secularism of the West isn't sufficient, we'll see a revival. It may not happen in my lifetime, but it will happen.

Another anon says:

The future of the United States is one hell of a lot more in doubt than the future of the church or religeon in general. The church and it's followers will endure. Our declining society, perhaps not.

Unfortunately, yes.

Anonymous said...

"that doesn't mean the energy can't travel back to the North"
Only if you think that people attend church like they eat burritos, otherwise just another case of wishful thinking.

Yet, Mr. D., I do agree that secularism, or as the philosophers might call it, materialism, at it's core attempts to answer everything, which doesn't leave any room for the mystical superstitious wonder that humans love to think has a factual reality. And as sad as this may be for our species, I believe we are doomed by our curious nature to stumble upon the truth that the Universe came from nothing and our future is an eternity of nothingness. Now, if the church can ease the pain of our fate, I'm all for it. But by any observable measure the HRC is a failure in decline. I don't think your desire for a more dogmatic inscrutable church and the church's need for a wider appeal and therefor more accessible ideas can coexist. I understand why protestant evangelism is ascending with the HRC's dilemma as a backdrop. Maybe that's way paying close attention to sports is oh so much more satisfying.

W.B. Picklesworth said...

Two quick thoughts:

-Why in the world would materialism make any claims about something so abstract as eternity? It wouldn't.

-Why the heck would a materialist find sports "satisfying"?

One more quick thought: there's no such thing as a strict materialist. It's just vanity. Of course, they've got no corner on that market.

Anonymous said...

Vanity of vanities, all is vanity - a more beautiful line may never have been written by man. I have always found Ecclesiastes 1:18 to be the terrible truth: For in much wisdom is much grief; and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Losing oneself in sports, or obscure dogma, or actuarial tables, or post-modern fiction, or birdwatching, or any other mindful labor that doesn't increase another person's pain (like making money) is a perfectly wonderful pose to address a silent indifferent Universe. People in this country are starting to learn that believing in that old time religion simply isn't an option for many of us. And a better world it may well be.

Mr. D said...

People in this country are starting to learn that believing in that old time religion simply isn't an option for many of us. And a better world it may well be.

So you believe. You don't seem to have picked up that you've simply changed the deity you worship to the individual you see in the mirror.

One of the things that we learned in Catholic school is that we all have free will. My choice, in midlife, is to learn more and understand my faith in a deeper way than I learned it during my youth. If you were more confident in your posture, you'd likely find less need to sneer at my fumbling for a better understanding of the world and my place in it. Just sayin'.

Gino said...

Word.