Friday, March 06, 2015

You get to see what you get to see

Hillary Clinton wants you to see her emails. But only the ones she releases:
Hillary Clinton says she wants the public to see her e-mails. But there are some that voters may never see: the ones she didn’t give to the government.

Clinton used a private server and e-mail address while U.S. secretary of state, and the law doesn’t force her to release any of the e-mails that she hasn’t turned over to the State Department.

Clinton, through spokesmen, said she turned over all e-mail about public business when she was the nation’s chief diplomat, and other messages may include notes to friends and personal contacts.

Open-government advocates say that’s not the point: the public should have a complete record of official e-mail communications, but Clinton’s may forever have gaps.

“There really is not a way to force an agency to turn those over, because they are not under the agency’s control,” Patrice McDermott, executive director of OpentheGovernment.org, a coalition that works to make more government records public, said. “They are not government records until they are turned over.”
So why would such an upstanding public official try to avoid full disclosure?

Here's a possibility:
The Washington Post reported last week that foreign sources, including governments, made up a third of those who have given the foundation more than $1 million over time. The Post found that the foundation, begun by former president Bill Clinton, has raised nearly $2 billion since its creation in 2001.

Foreign governments and individuals are prohibited from giving money to U.S. political candidates, to prevent outside influence over national leaders. But the foundation has given donors a way to potentially gain favor with the Clintons outside the traditional political limits.
Okay, that's not fair. I'm sure it was all above board. The Clintons never do anything unethical. So shut the hell up, haters.

9 comments:

Brad said...

"The Clinton Foundation is a Stargate-SG1 for money that's been laundered more frequently than one of Joan Crawford's peignoirs."

-Dennis Miller

W.B. Picklesworth said...

If I didn't know better, I'd say that our political system was more rotten than John Lydon.

Bike Bubba said...

What WB says. It strikes me that the thing I want most in the 2016 elections is a return to the rule of law. Not repeal of Obamacare, not repeal of the immigration stuff or the tax hikes, but the rule of law.

Gino said...

lets get to the bottom of the pardon sellings before we start a new outrage, shall we?

Mr. D said...

Pardon sellings? There ya go — old school!

Shoot, if this one doesn't finish the job on the Clintons, they've got the Jeffrey Epstein thing in reserve. The scandals are stacked up like planes at the airport, or Scott Walker's throne of skulls.

Bike Bubba said...

Gracious host, it occurs to me that if a plethora of scandals would finish a liberal politician in favor with the media, Obama would have been done for in 2010. History records differently.

And if we want to bring up the past, hey, the fact that the Senate didn't convict a guy who lost his law license for perjury and obstruction of justice has a lot to do with where we are now.

Like I said, I want the rule of law back, but I'm not holding my breath.

Mr. D said...

Oh, I don't think this scandal will stop the Clintons, Bubba. I'm not sure a thermonuclear blast could stop the Clintons.

Gino said...

Reagan was teflon... the clintons are reinforced concrete.

Bike Bubba said...

Just looked up Epstein....yikes, what a tangled web is woven with that guy. And we worry about what little college hijinks would be uncovered if we ran for office.

Yes, definitely two sets of rules here.