Thursday, December 29, 2016

il miglior fabbro

Walter Russell Mead, getting to the nub of it yet again, this time about Israel and the peace process that never seems to lead to peace:
The pretense that the peace process has survived from the hopeful years of the early 90s is a form of self-delusion. In fact, the Palestinians rejected the possibility of peace in the 1990s just as they rejected much more favorable plans in the late 1940s and the 1930s. Over and over again the solution that one generation contemptuously rejects becomes the utopia that its children long for. Those who say that the possibility for the two-state solution is fading are not all wrong; Israel is getting stronger and the Palestinians keep getting weaker, and as that happens their bargaining position grows worse.

For security reasons, nationalistic reasons, and religious reasons, many Israelis want the settlement process to continue. The Palestinians are powerless to stop it, and it gets harder every year for the Palestinians and their allies to slow it down. Facts on the ground are being created day by day, and those facts will inevitably play a role in future negotiations. What the Palestinians desperately need is to reach the best agreement they still can, and the terms will be worse ten years from now than they are today.

The odds are that the Palestinians will be unable to pull themselves together in this crisis just as they have so often failed in the past. For more than 100 years, the political incompetence of Palestinian leadership and the unorganized, fractured state of Palestinian society have been the secret weapon of the Zionist movement. That remains the case today.
I can also predict that, should this blog still be in operation in ten years' time, we'll still be talking about a peace process and that there won't be any peace.

1 comment:

R.A. Crankbait said...

Trump's proposed ambassador to Israel was done to show the Palestinians, and those funding them, that the deal is not going to get any better. This doesn't destroy the "peace process" because there isn't a process (as you noted). The idea that you come to the table with your best offer and beg them to take it (which has been the US position, imho) has not moved the needle. Take the sugar-coated carrot off the table and put a bear-trap with a red ribbon on there in it's place - and then you negotiate.

Everyone understands this, right? Right?