Sunday, August 26, 2018

The Faithful

We've been away a few days and there are countless things to discuss. Where to begin? We'll start here.

The primary order of business was bringing Fearless Maria to college. She is a student at Saint Louis University. She hasn't decided on a major yet, which seems wise inasmuch as she's only beginning her education tomorrow morning. SLU is a lot of things -- it's a mid-sized university with about 8,000 undergraduates. It's a Jesuit institution in a city with a large Catholic presence, but in a state that is part of the Bible Belt. It's a school that spends much of its time teaching its students practical things, with a heavy emphasis on STEM professions, especially in the medical field. It's an ambitious institution with a large endowment, north of a billion dollars, placing it in the top echelon of universities in the United States, although its renown does not match that of similar Catholic colleges such as Georgetown, Notre Dame, or Boston College. It lives in the considerable shadow of its neighbor five miles to the west, Washington University. It's a school that has benefited greatly from the pitched battles for students who seek to go to a top-echelon school, but fall just short for reasons that seem completely arbitrary. SLU lacks the glamor of Georgetown, but the substance of the education will be quite similar. It's also a long way from Minneapolis, every bit of nine hours by car. The city of St. Louis has its issues, but there are ample opportunities there. We are eager to see what happens in the next four years.

***

We returned to the Twin Cities on Friday and attended Mass at our home parish, St. Rose of Lima in Roseville. The presider at Mass was Archbishop Bernard Hebda, who was there to formally install our new pastor, Fr. Marc Paveglio. It was a lively Mass and it was a rare event to have the Archbishop in your house of worship. Hebda did not avoid the painful subject of clerical abuse, which continues to unfold. Many Catholics have turned away from the Church, but today's Gospel reading, from John 6, spoke directly to the question.

Many of Jesus' disciples who were listening said,
"This saying is hard; who can accept it?"
Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this,
he said to them, "Does this shock you?
What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending
to where he was before? 
It is the spirit that gives life,
while the flesh is of no avail.
The words I have spoken to you are Spirit and life.
But there are some of you who do not believe."
Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe
and the one who would betray him. 
And he said,
"For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me
unless it is granted him by my Father."

As a result of this,
many of his disciples returned to their former way of life
and no longer accompanied him.
Jesus then said to the Twelve, "Do you also want to leave?" 
Simon Peter answered him, "Master, to whom shall we go? 
You have the words of eternal life. 
We have come to believe
and are convinced that you are the Holy One of God."

Emphasis mine. Archbishop Hebda reminded us that we face the same question that Peter had to answer. The Church has made it easy, too easy, for people to leave, to go elsewhere. My sense is many Catholics are not becoming mainline Protestants, either, but rather turning away from organized religion entirely and, too often, turning away from God. I do not mean to diminish the horror of what too many priests and their superiors did to their victims, but the greater sin these men bear is that of turning away the faithful through their actions. Hebda's challenge, which Fr. Paveglio also shares, is to help us face the continuing reckoning, while also ensuring we do not lose faith, that we do not turn away from the promise of eternal life.

And the challenge continues, as today's headlines suggest:
In an extraordinary 11-page written testament, a former apostolic nuncio to the United States has accused several senior prelates of complicity in covering up Archbishop Theodore McCarrick’s allegations of sexual abuse, and has claimed that Pope Francis knew about sanctions imposed on then-Cardinal McCarrick by Pope Benedict XVI but chose to repeal them.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, 77, who served as apostolic nuncio in Washington D.C. from 2011 to 2016, said that in the late 2000s, Benedict had “imposed on Cardinal McCarrick sanctions similar to those now imposed on him by Pope Francis” and that Viganò personally told Pope Francis about those sanctions in 2013.

Archbishop Viganò said in his written statement, simultaneously released to the Register and other media, (see full text below) that Pope Francis “continued to cover” for McCarrick and not only did he “not take into account the sanctions that Pope Benedict had imposed on him” but also made McCarrick “his trusted counselor.”  Viganò said that the former archbishop of Washington advised the Pope to appoint a number of bishops in the United States, including Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago and Joseph Tobin of Newark.

Archbishop Viganò, who said his “conscience dictates” that the truth be known as “the corruption has reached the very top of the Church’s hierarchy,” ended his testimony by calling on Pope Francis and all of those implicated in the cover up of Archbishop McCarrick’s abuse to resign.   
By the way, Cardinal Tobin, who has his own issues, replaced Archbishop Hebda, who had been in Newark before Pope Francis sent him to St. Paul-Minneapolis. But let's set that aside for the moment. The real question is this: what do we make of this sensational allegation? Francis, above all else, is supposed to be a reformer, but if Archbishop Viganò is correct, Francis is an active participant in the continuing scandal. And it also raises another question -- what other forces were at play when Benedict XVI stepped aside? 

I have struggled with Francis since he became Pope. In important ways, he's been helping us focus on first principles, especially the importance of joining faith and good works. But in other ways, he's muddied the waters. Discernment is a continuing activity for Catholics; it has to be, really, because unexamined faith withers away. 

***

I had planned to get to John McCain and the continuing Trump circus, but that's enough for this evening. We'll get back to that and more in the coming days.

6 comments:

Gino said...

maybe i've been asleep for a decade or more... but didnt the Church go through these allegations around 15-20 years ago?

so, why is this bombshell, earth-shattering, breaking news?

ftr: i will remain catholic for the rest of my life, and maybe even become better at it over time (dont hold your breath).
As for the Church leadership: anybody who's grown up in the Faith knows its run by a pack of jackels. as a rule, Catholics dont follow the leadership. We suffer it. It is Christ that we follow.

3john2 said...

That this is still plaguing the Catholic Church after the earlier scandals is a scandal. Hyper-vigilance would seem to have been in order, given how much it cost the church in money and credibility.

Still, the sexual abuse by priests is dwarfed by the instances of the same and worse within the public school system.
https://americanvision.org/16723/the-big-double-standard-on-child-sex-abuse-no-one-is-talking-about/

Gino said...

i've read that abuse is no more rampant withing the Catholic church than any other. But since we are a large, slow moving target, much of what happens here gets noticed bigly when it does.

a very conservative, large and well known baptist church down the street from me is undergoing a trial of it own at the moment, concerning two youth ministers' actions with some of the youth... and the abuse is said to have been going on for decades.

still, there is no excuse. and My Church has a duty, regarding it's claims, to behave better than the rest.

Mr. D said...

That this is still plaguing the Catholic Church after the earlier scandals is a scandal. Hyper-vigilance would seem to have been in order, given how much it cost the church in money and credibility.

Yes, but it appears the real problem is that the Church has been attempting a modified limited hangout. And we all know how well that worked out for RMN.

still, there is no excuse. and My Church has a duty, regarding it's claims, to behave better than the rest.

Yes. A thousand times yes.

Gino said...

These allegations are against the highest levels of the hierarchy... Who only listen to/hear the voices of the highest level of the hierarchy... The perfect earthly home for Satan and his work. This struggle will not end soon. Satan targets the Church for a reason.

Bike Bubba said...

Gino, I think the Vatican is in the same place as Michigan State. They haven't been slapped around hard enough to learn their lesson. Hence not having learned from history, they are per Santayana doomed to repeat it. A bit of humor on the topic:

https://babylonbee.com/news/local-catholic-starting-to-think-church-needs-reformation/

https://babylonbee.com/news/pope-starting-to-suspect-he-might-be-antichrist/

My apologies if it's too soon for that.....