tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19838051.post114606912878693813..comments2024-01-28T22:16:50.852-06:00Comments on Mr. Dilettante’s Neighborhood: One more for Number 4Mr. Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13920907647566015611noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19838051.post-1146244656017820632006-04-28T12:17:00.000-05:002006-04-28T12:17:00.000-05:00Yo anonymous,The last all Big Ten d-back was an al...Yo anonymous,<BR/><BR/>The last all Big Ten d-back was an all-pro? Must have missed the announcement of Jamar Fletcher's all-pro season. Or did you mean Troy Vincent.<BR/><BR/>Nothing but trouble on Regent Street. But you likely knew that....Mr. Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13920907647566015611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19838051.post-1146244513366490222006-04-28T12:15:00.000-05:002006-04-28T12:15:00.000-05:00Hey Stinger,I hear you. Re Rodgers, I know, I kno...Hey Stinger,<BR/><BR/>I hear you. Re Rodgers, I know, I know, but we'll need to find out whether he's just a Tedfordite sooner or later. Well, we'll see what Brett has left.Mr. Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13920907647566015611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19838051.post-1146201685785206372006-04-28T00:21:00.000-05:002006-04-28T00:21:00.000-05:00Charles Woodson???????I'd rather take a chance (pa...Charles Woodson???????<BR/>I'd rather take a chance (pardon the ABBA pun) on the former Badger Jim Leonard from northern Wisconsin that was recently all Big Ten. Excuse me, but the last all Big Ten D-Back from Wisconsin turned out to be a pro-bowler, and I don't mean he favored the one-time bartender at the Big Ten Pub on Regent St.,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19838051.post-1146095104285221272006-04-26T18:45:00.000-05:002006-04-26T18:45:00.000-05:00I would be more ambivalent about it myself, but th...I would be more ambivalent about it myself, but the thought of Aaron Rodgers becoming the starter this year absolutely frightens me. So, just based on that, I am glad Favre is back. As for the fears that this could tarnish his legacy, I don't think it will that much. Nothing is going to change the fact that Favre is a sure-fire first-ballot Hall of Famer. Nothing is going to change the fact that he played an integral part in bringing the Lombardi Trophy home. Nothing is going to change the ungodly stats he has put up over his career, while almost never having a stud WR to throw the ball to at all. He has made so many players better over the years. I still think he can do that, despite his throwing 29 picks last year. And even if he reverts to 2005 form, there is still no question that Favre is the best QB the Packers ever had. <BR/><BR/>Are the Packers going to be all that good this year? Not bloody likely. The only reason I could see them putting up a decent record is because they play a weak schedule. They only play 4 games against playoff teams from last year, and two of those are at Lambeau. So, just having Favre back makes this upcoming season just a bit more palatable. Otherwise, the Pack was a 3-13 team at best. Aaron Rodgers is junk. He is a Jeff Tedford QB, and exactly ZERO Jeff Tedford QBs have had even good careers (I know, Dilfer has a ring...he can thank Ray Lewis and the Ravens D for that). Rodgers slipped to 24 for a reason. <BR/><BR/>And one positive side effect of Favre coming back: the Pack signed Charles Woodson, who instantly makes the secondary a lot better. One of the reasons Woodson is signing with the Packers is because of Favre coming back.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com