If you want to understand the sort of people who run our government and how they operate, this story from Mollie Hemingway is crucial:
The FBI’s top brass initiated conversations with a White House official that were quickly leaked to CNN, according to a new book.Well, yes. Way too much of what is in the NYT is bovine fecal matter. We continue:
Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe asked to speak privately with White House chief of staff Reince Priebus following a February 2017 intelligence briefing. The scene is described in “Media Madness,” Howard Kurtz’s new book on the press and its relationship with the Trump administration. McCabe said he asked for the meeting to tell Priebus that “everything” in a New York Times story authored by Michael S. Schmidt, Mark Mazzetti, and Matt Apuzzo was “bullsh-t.”
McCabe claimed to want Priebus to know the FBI’s perspective that this story was not true. Priebus pointed to the televisions that were going non-stop on the story. He asked if the FBI could say publicly what he had just told him. McCabe said he’d have to check, according to the book.Actually, I bet we all could, but here you go:
McCabe reportedly called back and said he couldn’t do anything about it. Then-FBI director James Comey reportedly called later and also said he couldn’t do anything, but did offer to brief the Senate Intelligence Committee on the matter later that week, suggesting they’d spill the beans publicly. You’ll never guess what happened next, according to the book:
Now, a week later, CNN was airing a breaking news story naming Priebus. According to ‘multiple U.S. officials,’ the network said, ‘the FBI rejected a White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump’s associates and Russians known to U.S. intelligence.’Because Andrew McCabe is a weasel. And Reince Priebus was a trusting guy from Wisconsin who didn't understand how the game is played. In other words, this is what happened (video not safe for work):
Priebus was stunned by the implication that he was pressuring law enforcement. Had he been set up? Why was the FBI leaking this information when one of its top officials had initiated the conversation?
And these sorts of games continued. Back to Hemingway:
This story gives a glimpse into how that original Russia narrative may have been spread around to overly compliant journalists and other members of the “resistance.” It was the hysteria surrounding this and other stories that led the White House to be frustrated with a law enforcement agency and chief playing games. As Comey admitted under oath, he did tell President Trump three times that Trump was not under investigation. These private statements to Trump occurred while Comey publicly insinuated the opposite. This story above fits the same pattern.These are the dedicated public servants Adam Schiff and the rest of the Democrats are claiming deserve deference. And these are the friends of Robert Mueller.
5 comments:
This is why the McCabe's of the world need to be more than let go from government "service." They need to be convicted, tried, and shot.
Or shot, convicted, and tried. Drawn and quartered? Something other than, "rewarded with a plush pension and a life of ease providing juicy anonymous quotes for other people in our society who should be shot for treason.
If helping stage a coup isn't treason, what is?
We might say that Trump ought to have fired McCabe for sharing private information when the report came out--no other source could have provided the information. Fired for cause isn't imprisoned or executed, but you at least set a precedent that other leakers might heed.
I'm thinking this investigation will lead to McCabe and Comey et al needing high priced attorneys. This is good, as it will leave them financially devastated... poetic justice since this how these guys operate, anyway.
Post a Comment