The wonders of Obamacare proceed apace:
Nancy Pippenger and Marcia Perez live thousands of miles apart but have the same complaint: Doctors who treated them last year won't take their insurance now, even though they haven't changed insurers.So why is that?
"They said, 'We take the old plan, but not the new one,' " says Perez, an attorney in Palo Alto, Calif.
In Plymouth, Ind., Pippenger got similar news from her longtime orthopedic surgeon, so she shelled out $300 from her own pocket to see him.
Both women unwittingly enrolled in policies with limited networks of doctors and hospitals that provide little or no payment for care outside those networks. Such plans existed before the health law, but with its expansion of insurance, they are covering more people — and some are shrinking enrollees' options further than before. The policies' limitations have come as a surprise to some enrollees used to broader job-based coverage or to plans they held before the law took effect.
"It's totally different," said Pippenger, 57, whose new Anthem Blue Cross plan doesn't pay for any care outside its network, although the job-based Anthem plan she had last year did cover some of those costs. "Now I can't find a doctor."
Insurers say they are simply trying to provide low-cost plans in a challenging environment. The new federal health law doesn't let them reject enrollees with health problems or charge them more just because they are sick. So they are using the few tools left to them — contracting with smaller groups of hospitals and doctors willing to accept lower reimbursements; requiring referrals for specialty care; and limiting coverage outside those networks.It's really a head-scratcher, that the people who ultimately have to pay the bills would try to find ways to cut costs. That never happens in any other sort of enterprise, right?
All the standard aphorisms apply -- you can't get something for nothing. There's no such thing as a free lunch. Something that can't go on, won't go on. Wonkery and Ivy League wizardry notwithstanding, it never made sense to assume that the people who brought you the post office and the Department of Motor Vehicles could somehow do a superior job of delivering health care.
Of course, to use yet another aphorism, there are some things that are so foolish that only an intellectual could believe them. Or, alternatively, it could be this (h/t Stacy McCain):
Meanwhile, Ms. Pippenger, you'll just have to deal with the doctor you can get, not the doctor you want. Change you can believe in.
2 comments:
Herr D, I find it beneficial to read the byline of just about every commercial media story, and think twice about speakers who think they have it all figured out. If you noticed the byline of the USA Today you reprinted ad hoc you would have seen that it was produced by Kaiser Health News, which I imagine is kept alive by Kaiser Permanente, the healthcare giant (although keeping things alive has never been one of Kaiser's strong suits). So I'm thinking that this story of someone's difficulties getting care from Anthem, one of Kaiser's rivals, has more to do marketing and sales than patient care. Shame on those editors at USA Today for taking Kaiser's ad money then printing such a shameless attack at one of their (Kaiser's) rivals. I call this kind of garbage "CRAPITALISM" and you can see it everywhere you look; makes a person wonder who won the Cold War, the West, or Proctor and Gamble. And Evan Sayet is a hack comic who couldn't get a laugh in the '80s when every strip mall in America had a Laugh Bucket comedy club and would hire any schmuck with twenty minutes on the difference between NY and LA and showed up on time. He's been looking for an gig since Evening at the Improv last aired and found a gullible audience on the right who'll buy his schtick. At least Dennis Miller had a career before he fell in love with rich people.
Ah, so you prefer to impugn the motives of people first. Anonymously, too. Appreciate the clarification.
Post a Comment