Benster and D Pick Your Games -- Eagerly Awaiting the Tradition-Laden Beef O'Brady's Bowl Edition

We're running out of college football games, Decrepit! But pretty soon the bowls will begin and the highly inspirational Beef O'Brady's Bowl will take place. I can't wait to see Louisville and Southern Mississippi duke it out over some tasty Beef O'Brady! Can you feel the HYYYYYPPPPPEEE!

No, youngblood -- I gotta be honest with you. I'm not feeling it.

But old dude, Beef O'Brady's looks just like Hooter's, except a lot more boring!

Yep, and a game between Louisville and Southern Miss would be pretty boring, too.

It's 10 days away, old dude. Try to get yourself psyched up, okay? In the meantime, don't worry. I've got other assignments for you. Now it's time to make some picks. Watch me work:

Army Black Knights (+8) vs. Navy Mids, at Philadelphia. Mrs. D always likes this game, because the fans are dressed up in their nice uniforms and don't have body paint on themselves. That's because these future military leaders have to deal with drill sergeants at 6 a.m., unlike kids from other colleges, the jackwagons! Anyway, these young men are going on to do good things, unlike the BCS, which is EVIL EVIL EVIL, I tell you! Mids 35, Cadets 21.

I knew you couldn't resist a BCS dig. Both Army and Navy are going to bowls this year, which would be a nice thing, except that there are approximately 2,475 bowl games this year. In fact, chances are you personally are playing in a bowl game and just don't realize it yet. Navy has won this game pretty frequently in recent years and I don't think that will change this time. Navy 31, Army 24.

New York Football Giants (-2 1/2) vs. Minnesota Down Goes Fraziers. Is this the day that Brett Favre doesn't answer the bell? He has a shoulder injury, which makes it very hard to throw the football. Now mind you, the way Favre has been throwing the football lately, we might not be able to tell the difference. So it could be T-Jack Attack. Can he handle the Giants? Will he be out of luck against Justin Tuck? Yes. Andre the Giant 30, T-Jack Attack 20.

I haven't heard what Favre's status is -- he could be a game time decision. Of course, given the fact that we are predicted to get about 726 inches of snow this weekend, the entire game might be a game time decision. But I digress. I'm not sure it does the Vikings any good to play the old guy anyway -- they need to know if T-Jack can handle the job. The Giants are a very good test. The guess here: T-Jack surprises a few people. Vikings 27, Giants 20.

Glorious Green Bay Packers (-6 1/2) vs. Motor City Kitties. Well, in a couple of weeks I, the Benster, will be in Lambeau to watch the Packers play the Giants. In the meantime, the Packers have to go to Detroit. What a thrill for them! The question for me is which Packer team shows up. Is it the one that showed up against Washington and Miami and stunk up the joint, or the team that knocked two NFL coaches out of a job. It won't be easy, since the Lions are capable of hanging with teams, but they seem to run out of gas at the end. Packers 20, Lions 19.

The Lions are getting better. Despite the 2-10 record, they have some guys you have to plan for, especially Calvin Johnson and Ndamukong Suh. But they are playing their 3rd string quarterback and the Packers are going to be plenty motivated. I suspect it will go well for the boys in Green. Packers 35, Lions 17.

New England Benjarvus Green-Ellises (-3) vs. Bear Down Chicago da Bearz. Strangely enough, some of the kids in school have been calling me Benjarvus Green-Ellis, even though I don't have an NFL resume or really cool hair like that guy. But it's cool with me. I have to wonder if New England has enough left in the tank after Monday's demolition of the New York Jets. The Bears are a Jekyll and Hyde team but they've been very good lately. The game is in Chicago, which will help, since New England never loses at home. Sorry Gino -- I have to pick the Pats for standings reasons. Benjarvus Green-Ellis 90, Dit-ka Dit-ka 0.

Uh, no. I think the Patriots could win. And I'd really like it if they did. But I'm very worried about this one. The Pats are certainly due for a letdown and the Bears seem to have found something lately. You can move the ball on the New England defense and I suspect that the Bears will move it. I hate this pick, but here it is: Bears 27, Patriots 24.

Old fella, I think you need to run me and Fearless Maria up to Beef O'Brady's one of these days so I can have me some buffalo wings or Beef O'Brady or something. I bet they serve haggis, too. Ben out!

Joel of Arc

Joel Rosenberg is a topnotch writer and gun safety instructor and an excellent person. He has lately been fighting the power, a/k/a the Minneapolis Police Department. There's a long story involved but, suffice it to say, the MPD doesn't like it very much if you publicly demonstrate their hamhandedness. This synopsis at Popehat does a good job of explaining what's going on. Mitch Berg has also been following this story closely. If you believe in principle and also decry capricious law enforcement, and you should, this is a story worth watching.

Science!

If you've ever expressed any skepticism about the increasingly ineffectual campaign against global warming climate change, chances are pretty good you've been accused of being against science. Global warming climate change activists pride themselves on their superior understanding of science. Just ask them.

It is precisely this measure of erudition among the scientific elites who support lavish funding of their research, and the young acolytes who believe in Science, that makes it easy to find signatories at the latest global warming climate change confab in Cancun (natch, why go to Copenhagen again and risk it snowing during your presentations) who would put their John Hancocks on a petition to ban an especially odious chemical compound, the dreaded global warming agent DHMO*.

Wonder if Kate Knuth signed this one. . . .


*DHMO is Dihydrogen Monoxide, also known as water.

And so, Governor Dayton

Tom Emmer decided to concede yesterday, so we are now faced with the prospect of four years of Governor Mark Dayton. A few thoughts:

• If you search around the local blogosphere, you'll see the same greeting for Mr. Dayton twice, from both Mitch Berg and Gary Gross: Welcome to Hell. If that seems somehow ungracious, let me help you understand why so many conservatives are especially bitter about this election: it's not just that Tom Emmer lost by such a close margin. It's the incredibly sleazy and cynical way Mark Dayton ran his campaign, with the complicity of a news media that completely ignored all the red flags that surround the governor-elect. This is a man who couldn't handle the rigors of being a backbencher Senator, but now he will be in charge of a state government. This is also a man who has had myriad substance abuse problems and mental health issues. He is ill-equipped for the job on any number of levels. Of all the prominent figures on the Minnesota political scene, he was the worst possible choice for an executive position. And yet here he is. And a lot of people, who know all these things, were cheering him on.
• The good news is that Dayton will have adult supervision in the form of a legislature that is now in Republican hands. Dayton will not be able to raise taxes, because the lege holds the power of the purse. I don't suspect that Dayton's calls for tax hikes will get much traction among the citizenry either, especially since it now appears that inflation is coming and will eat away at household incomes. Gas prices are now around $3 a gallon and that's a sign of things to come. Nor will punitive tax policies be likely to attract new business to the state. I'm guessing that Dan Hindbjorgen of the Sioux Falls Development Council will be spending a lot of time in the recording studio over the next few years.
• Watch carefully who ends up being on Dayton's staff. There's been a lot of speculation on the starboard side that Mike Hatch would have a prominent role in a prospective Dayton administration. That could happen. What I want to see is if Matt Entenza has a role. You might remember Entenza, the unappealing politico with the rich wife who spent millions of dollars on a primary campaign in which he never really criticized Dayton, instead attacking Emmer and, at the very end, Dayton's real DFL challenger, Margaret Anderson Kelliher. It's always struck me as strange that Entenza would do these things, unless he had some expectation of either (a) a prominent role in a Dayton administration, or (b) the prospect of having state monies directed to his wife's environmental startup company. I'm going to watch this carefully. If Entenza has a role in a Dayton administration, it ought to be a subject of discussion.

Watching the Wheels

True story: on the day John Lennon was killed, I had turned in a paper I wrote for my high school sociology class concerning gun control. And as a young smartass and White Album fan, I had titled the paper, "Happiness is a Warm Gun."

I was a senior in high school and learned the news as I sat at the dining room table, which was where I typically did my homework in those days. I had lugged out the massive, cobalt blue IBM Selectric typewriter that my dad had brought home from the office. I was typing up a paper for my high school English class that was due the next morning. You could see the television set in the living from there and at the end of the 10 p.m. news, a late bulletin arrived. John Lennon had been shot dead in New York City.

It's easy to forget now, but it was the beginning of a very violent 10 month period. At the end of that long winter of 1980-81, President Reagan nearly died at the hands of an assassin. Not long after, Pope John Paul II nearly met his maker. By the fall, Anwar Sadat was felled.

My generation was too young to really understand the events of the 1960s, especially the toll of the assassins of that blighted decade. We had come of age in the 1970s, a time that seems especially grim in retrospect. It was pretty easy for me, and for a lot of my classmates, to adopt a mask of adolescent cynicism and to sneer at a lot of what we saw in front of us.

When Lennon was killed that night, I remember thinking that cynicism I felt about my life and future prospects was somehow justified. I felt like a caged animal in those days, believing that I was being constrained by the petty, small-minded town I had called home. I kept thinking to myself -- I just can't wait to get the hell out of this place. It wasn't for me, this silly backwater of Appleton, Wisconsin. There was no way I would ever come back to Podunk and I sneered at my classmates who seemed content to stay and settle for the blandishments of a boring little town, a suburb without a city attached to it.

The thing was, that cynicism had a very thin veneer. I remember that when we were discussing the murder in school the next day, one of my friends reported the reaction of Mick Jagger, who called Lennon's murder "a good career move" or something like that. We were all convinced it was the worst thing we'd ever heard and some of my friends vowed to get rid of their Stones albums. They didn't.

Adolescents are like that -- simultaneously full of dreams and full of shit. 30 years later, I now have an adolescent son, who has a far sunnier disposition than I did at the same age. That's a good thing and will serve him well, because cynicism at a young age can corrode your soul in ways that are difficult to understand until years later. He's coming of age in a time that's like the late 1970s in too many ways. He even prefers 1970s era music -- if you grab his MP3 player you'll find a lot of AC/DC and Aerosmith. He's at the age where he's starting to question many things and he's discovering that the world can disappoint you if you let it. My job is to ensure that he sees the opportunities that remain, even in a low, mendacious time.

Many, many things have changed in the 30 years since John Lennon died. One thing hasn't -- I still do a lot of my writing at the dining room table. And while I look at John Lennon's more fuzzy nostrums with a gimlet eye these days, I'm actually a lot less cynical than I was in 1980. No matter how rotten the world might look, there are always opportunities if we choose to see them.

il miglior fabbro

Yesterday was the 69th anniversary of Pearl Harbor. As usual, Mitch Berg has an excellent take.

Apparently we shouldn't even bother

We're doomed, I tells ya. No chance at all for any Republican to unseat Amy Klobuchar, it would appear:

Sen. Amy Klobuchar holds a double-digit lead over the biggest names in the Republican Party who could possibly challenge her in 2012, an early Public Policy Polling survey found.

Wrote PPP: "Amy Klobuchar is overwhelmingly popular and would cruise to reelection at this point pretty much no matter who her Republican opponent was."

Hell, Klobuchar should run for Divine Right Monarch with those numbers, right? Let's just say this: we'll check back in a year or so, or even in 18 months, when people start paying attention.

Changing the Tone

Do you remember when President Obama pledged to change the tone in Washington? He sure did it today. Behold as he describes his negotiating session with the Loyal Opposition:

As he recounted the White House effort to get the GOP to relinquish its support for those cuts -- something he described as the party's "holy grail" -- the president admitted bluntly, "I have not been able to budge them." Opinion polls show overwhelming popular support for ending the tax breaks for higher earners. He later added, "I think it's tempting not to negotiate with hostage takers, unless the hostage gets harmed, then people will question the wisdom of that strategy. In this case, the hostage was the American people, and I was not willing to see them get harmed."

Emphasis mine. I'm glad to see that the President is taking things so well.

Standards for thee, but not for me

Jamie Dupree of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution details another vote of confidence for ObamaCare:

The Obama Administration has quietly granted even more waivers to one provision of the new federal health reform law, doubling the number in just the last three weeks to a new total of 222.

One of the more recognizable business names included on the newly-expanded list of waivers issued by the feds is that of Waffle House, which received a waiver on November 23 for health coverage that covers 3,947 enrollees.

Another familiar name was that of Universal Orlando, which runs a variety of very popular resorts in the Orlando, Florida area. Universal was given a waiver for plans that cover 668 workers.

These waivers deal with limited health benefit plans, sometimes referred to as "mini-med" policies, which companies as large as McDonald's use for some its employees.

So why would these companies need waivers? And why would the Obama administration be so eager to grant them?

The feds though have granted waivers from that law, amid concern that certain groups would drop their health insurance programs entirely. Those waivers are good for one year, and can be considered for renewal.

So, what sorts of groups would drop their health insurance?

Several weeks ago, critics singled out a number of unions which had received government approval for exemptions from certain provisions of the law dealing with annual medical spending limit requirements.

And there are more unions who have received waivers in this latest batch, like the Bricklayers Local 1 of MD, VA and DC, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, the Indiana Teamsters Health Benefits Fund, Service Employees International Union Local 1 Cleveland Welfare Fund, and more are listed.

And here I thought that unions were among the most enthusiastic supporters of ObamaCare. Go figure. There's a lot more at the link. Go read the whole thing.

This Morning's Pinata

Timothy Dalrymple, via Allahpundit:

For the cultural elitists on the Left, Palin lacks everything they pride themselves on possessing, possesses everything they pride themselves on scorning, and stands for everything they pride themselves on opposing. She lacks cosmopolitan tastes and elite university credentials, a well-worn passport and fluency in foreign tongues, a blueblood vocabulary and literary speech patterns, not to mention a fashionable address and a vacation home on Martha’s Vineyard. She possesses a beauty-queen title and the wrong kind of good looks, a large brood of lily-white children with outdoorsy names like Track and Piper, a commoner’s cadence and a steady supply of you-betcha folksy phrases, and a background in conservative white evangelical and even Pentecostal churches. And she stands for the defense of the unborn, for heterosexual marriage, for premarital abstinence, for the extraction of our natural resources, for small government and second amendment rights, for conservative Judeo-Christian traditions and for American exceptionalism.

There's an element of truth to that, although I know plenty of people who hate Palin who do not have elite university credentials or a blueblood vocabulary. I'm not convinced that Palin would be the right person to be president -- in some respects she is the antitheses of Barack Obama and would represent an overreaction to what we now have.

Read the whole thing.

Lightning Round - 120610

Catching up after a weekend mostly spent away from the internet:

• It's not especially surprising that Tom Emmer's campaign is not faring well in the recount, since there's obviously no stomach for it among most people. The only way you can stop voter fraud is to make it too painful for those who would commit. If we aren't willing to send people to jail for false vouching or voting more than once, nothing is going to change. Once the votes are cast, it's too late. It's clear that Minnesota isn't ready to punish people for such behaviors. As a practical matter, it means that Republicans need to win elections by larger margins than Democrats do, so long as Democrats control the apparatus of voting.
• Lori Sturdevant bashed Tim Pawlenty pretty good on Sunday in the Star Tribune, essentially blaming Pawlenty personally for the mythical $6.2 billion deficit. What she's really mad about is this: Pawlenty exposed the fiction of government funding by auto-pilot, which she desires. And since the D's won't control the Legislature this time around, the spending she'd envisioned won't happen and the budget deficit she posits won't materialize. Which, unless I miss my guess, Sturdevant will credit to the heretofore unrealized genius fiscal management skills of Mark Dayton.
• Badgers to the Rose Bowl, to face Texas Christian. TCU was once part of the big time as the footwipe of the old Southwestern Conference, but they now are one of the so-called "BCS Busters," although that will change next year when Horned Frogs join the Big East. I have a feeling that a lot of people who like the current system will be hoping that the Badgers put a whipping on the Horned Frogs. It should be a fun game.
• Meanwhile, the hapless Gophers have selected a guy named Jerry Kill as their new head football coach. My son and colleague Benster has already informed me that the term often used for the Gophers around here, the "Golden Roadkill," is still operative.

New Neighbors?

The Star Tribune reports this morning that the Vikings have been talking with various politicos in Ramsey, Anoka and Washington Counties about potentially siting their new stadium at the Twin Cities Ammunition Plant site in Arden Hills.

I can see why the Vikings would be interested; they have up to 430 acres available, the site is only about 12 miles north of downtown Minneapolis and while the roads would need a major upgrade, there would be development possibilities galore.

The cost of developing the site could be problematic -- there's a lot of pollution there and while the Army is committed to the cost of some remediation, it's always been an open question concerning how viable the site is for development, since no one really knows for sure what's buried out there. Right now the roads in the area are not sufficient to handle the potential traffic, but it could be improved without changing the current routing patterns that much. If the Vikings came, it would also have a potentially huge impact on what happens at the Northwest Quadrant site in New Brighton.

There's a lot to sort out, but if this thing goes through, it could be a huge game changer for my little corner of the world.

MDE Notices a Local

Minnesota Democrats Exposed is under new management these days and one of the new guys at blog, Andy Post, noticed that our plucky, orange-clad state representative, Kate Knuth, got her climate change trip to Copenhagen funded by the Will Steger Foundation. The thing is, the Steger Foundation also gets money from the state. Knuth apparently recused herself from voting on this funding when the final vote came before the House, but she may not have recused herself from when the measure was voted out of committee. You can evaluate all this at the MDE site, which promises a Part II to the story as well.

Benster and D Pick Your Games -- How Old Is Decrepit, Anyway? Edition

So, I hear it's your birthday, old fella! How old are you again? The over/under is 104.

Take the under, Seabiscuit. I'm only 47.

Whatever! Happy birthday, Dad! I may give you grief because you're old, and you are really quite old, by the way. But I still love you -- not that it's going to stop me from kicking your butt yet again this week.

Well, of course it isn't. What games have you selected for us, Grasshopper?

Here they come. Watch me work:

Oregon Quack Quack Attack (-16 1/2) vs. Oregon State Buck Toothed Varmints. Who's gonna stop the Duck? I know how you do it, so listen up, Beavers -- you play ball control. The Oregon offense can't score if they never see the field. Turn those running backs loose and keep pounding the rock. Also, this Oregon team isn't as good as the team from last year and you remember what happened last year -- when Oregon faced a team with quality personnel (that would be The Ohio State University), they fell short. Buck Toothed Varmints 35, Quack Quack Attack 7.

Don't get me wrong -- I think the Beavers have a chance on their home field. But I think the young fella is picking that one with his heart, because he wants TCU to get to the National Championship Game. I don't see it. The Ducks score a lot of points and are actually quite a bit more ruthless than a certain Cardinal-clad midwestern team that I'm fond of. And with the National Championship Game in their sights, they won't fall short. Oregon 42, Oregon State 21.

Oklahoma Boomer Sooner (-5) vs. Nebraska Future Big Ten Representatives, in lovely Arlington, Texas. It's the last chance for Nebraska to give a parting shot to their soon-to-be former rivals. The Cornhuskers are headed for the Big Ten next year and will be in the same division as the Gophers, who are looking forward to facing yet another team that will kick their butts. Look for Nebraska to go out on top. Johnny Rodgers 70, Jack Mildren 63.

Wow, that's old school even for me! Nice 1970s name check, young fella! I think Nebraska will enjoy the Big Ten, but they'll miss this rivalry in particular, which has been a classic over the years. I suspect that Oklahoma will win this one, but it's gonna be close. Oklahoma 35, Nebraska 31.

Au-Barn WAAAR-Eagle! (-5) vs. South Carolina Gamecocks, in Atlanta, GA. So, I wonder if I can get a loan from Cam Newton? He must have a tough time running down the field with all those $100 bills stuffed down his pants. I'm a nice young man and am perfectly willing to lighten his load a bit. Benster will take good care of your Benjamins, Cam! Really, trust me! I'm going to have to play devil's advocate again -- remember, once upon a time, Florida lost to the Seminoles in the regular season, but beat them when it mattered later on. I'm gonna call it! Gamecocks 17, WAAAR-Eagle 13.

I actually agree with you. The Auburn situation has been a bit of a circus this week and they have a lot of pressure. I've seen the Gamecocks play a few times this season and they are pretty good. I suspect the Ol' Ball Coach has a trick or two ready this time for Newton and the rest of the Auburn squad. I also like this because it would put TCU in the Championship Game and Stanford in the Rose Bowl where they belong. Gamecocks 34, Auburn 24.

Buffalo Wings (+6) vs. Minnesota Down Goes Fraziers. Do I even need to analyze this? Joe Frazier 100, B-Dubs 0.

Apparently you didn't need to analyze this. So I will -- the paying customers of this free blog demand analysis. Buffalo is playing very well, although their receiver Stevie Johnson had an existential crisis over the weekend after he dropped a sure touchdown pass last week. I don't think that God is a Steelers fan, but the Bills have been pretty God-forsaken or something this season. Vince Lombardi got his theology from the Jesuits and they said "Run to Win." So you should pick the team with Adrian Peterson (even an injured Adrian Peterson) in that context. Vikings 24, Bills 17.

San Francisco 49ers (+9 1/2) vs. Glorious Green Bay Packers. It's Decrepit's birthday today, and it's also the birthday of Aaron Rodgers, who is 20 years younger than the old fella. In other words, Rodgers is in his prime right now. And also the 49ers never beat the Packers. It's not gonna start on Sunday, especially considering that the Packers are going to come out swinging the Hammer of the Gods. Pack 27, Niners 20.

Here's the thing I don't get -- the Wisconsin Badgers have 3 top running backs and the Packers have none. Isn't there any way they could sneak Montee Ball into the stadium under an assumed name or something? They could call him Montee Blood McNally or something. The Packers won't need him this week, but later on. . . . Packers 31, San Fran 17.

Bear Down Chicago da Bearz (-3 1/2) vs. Motor City Kitties. Gino has been whining incessantly that we aren't paying sufficient attention to his Bears, so here we go. The Bears are currently leading the division, behind the quality quarterback play of Jack Concannon, er, I mean Bob Avellini, er, scratch that, Mike Tomczak, no, that's not right, Peter Tom Willis. Yeah, that's it. The last time these teams met, Calvin Johnson somehow didn't catch the ball that he actually caught. It's really quite confusing. Like how the Lions have a chance to get roasted on Thanksgiving every. single. year. Rex Grossman 7, Eric Hipple 6.

Okay, my pick is likely wishful thinking, but while we have great respect and admiration for our pal Gino, screw the Bears. I keed, I keed. Are the Bears the better team? Yeah. Will they win on Sunday? Not necessarily. Lions 24, Bears 20.

We're a little early this week because I'm dragging the old man camping this weekend. Out in the cold, even! Ben out!

Lightning Round - 120210

Another year older, not necessarily another year wiser. A few quick thoughts:

• There are a lot of people who were absolutely outraged at the "outing" of Valerie Plame who don't seem to care very much about the Wikileaks matter. I don't get that and would love to have someone explain why that is.
• Mike Huckabee apparently believes that the Republican Establishment doesn't like him because he didn't go to the right school. My glittering academic credentials fall short of Ivy as well, but I would say this: the real problem with Mike Huckabee is not the school he attended, but that he's wrong about many, many things.
• I don't hold much hope that the recount now underway will tip the election back to Tom Emmer, but I do suspect that a proper vetting of all the issues would be enormously instructive. We like to tell ourselves that we are somehow different in Minnesota, that we are less corrupt and more right-thinking. Geography has never been a barrier to baser human impulses.

A Valuable Service

One of the best things about being a conservative is that you are almost guaranteed to feel the love and respect of those who disagree with your politics. Consider the lessons that John Hinderaker, writing at Powerline, has discovered. Hinderaker discusses a strategy memo he received from Ed Kilgore, James Vega and J. P. Green, who are apparently deep thinkers on the portside:

They begin by referring to a Washington Monthly article in which a blogger named Steve Benen "gave voice to a growing and profoundly disturbing concern among Democrats--that Republicans may actually plan to embrace policies designed to deny Obama not only political victories but also the maximum possible economic growth during his term in order weaken Democratic prospects in the 2012 elections."

What rat bastards these Republicans are! But if Steve Benen says so, it has to be true. Hinderaker demonstrates precisely how true such assertions are by fisking the hell out of them, an exercise that is well worth reading in its entirety. And see, that's the problem -- you can't be challenging the assertions of Democrats, especially given the Republican history of saying Really Terrible Things. It's worth considering the incendiary words of Newt Gingrich that the Democratic strategists have noted:

Republican leaders are now under enormous pressure to maintain a very belligerent, warlike rhetoric and style in all their activities. John Boehner is, after all, in the line of succession begun by Newt Gingrich, the first Republican congressional leader to explicitly argue for politics as a form of warfare (In 1994 Gingrich said: "This war [between liberals and conservatives] has to be fought with the scale and duration and savagery that is only true of civil wars")...

Hinderaker, channeling his belligerence, comments:

Actually, Gingrich said that in 1988, after Senate Democrats disgracefully slandered Robert Bork--a genuine instance of politics as warfare. His next words were, "While we are lucky in this country that our civil wars are fought at the ballot box, not on the battlefields, nonetheless this is a civil war." But what, exactly, is the point here? Theauthors resurrect Newt Gingrich's most incendiary quote of the last 30 years and it is supposed to be a news flash?

I assume it simply represents fealty to a core Democratic Party value, which is the importance of recycling.

A little perspective is important on the issues of the day, and it is valuable that Democrats and their allies are able to provide that perspective to us. Consider the wisdom of Keith Olbermann, who is able to look past the superficial harm caused by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange and get to a more representative source of evil in the world.

If we aren't sufficiently appreciative of this service, it's worth noting that Democrats have been remarkably diligent about providing such reminders, for a very long time now. Jeffrey Lord, writing at the American Spectator, reminds us of this tireless service:

The 2012 Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting is not very bright.

In fact, dumb as a post is a more accurate if blunt assessment..

Does this describe Sarah Palin? Yes -- if you choose to listen to the Inside-the-Beltway elites. But just in case she doesn't run for or win the nomination, don't worry. Whoever the GOP nominates will quickly assume this "too dumb to be president" role -- bestowed by many of the same people.

Why?

Because this "too dumb to be president" argument is precisely the same-old, same-old argument from liberal elites about Republican presidents or prospective presidents for decades. The argument is particularly relished when it comes to describing conservatives like the former Alaska governor. But even GOP moderates
can never escape this tag once they morph from unannounced candidate (and therefore not a political threat to liberalism) to actual frontrunner, nominee or, God forbid, the actual president.

Lord catalogs these efforts in detail, including the admonitions offered concerning Reagan, Goldwater, Ford and other dimly remembered Republicans. His piece is well worth a read, if only to remind us all of the selfless service the Democratic Party continues to provide in tutoring those of us who need instruction.

Principles and the Times

Not to put too fine a point on it, but I don't think I'll ever take a word that's printed in the New York Times seriously again. Scott Johnson at Powerline lays it out nicely:

The New York Times is participating in the dissemination of the stolen State Department cables that have been made available to it in one way or another via WikiLeaks. My friend Steve Hayward recalls that only last year the New York Times ostentatiously declined to publish or post any of the Climategate emails because they had been illegally obtained. Surely readers will recall Times reporter Andrew Revkin's inspiring statement of principle: "The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won't be posted here."

Interested readers may want to compare and contrast Revkin's statement of principle with the editorial note posted by the Times on the WikiLeaks documents this afternoon. Today the Times cites the availability of the documents elsewhere and the pubic interest in their revelations as supporting their publication by the Times. Both factors applied in roughly equal measure to the Climategate emails.

Without belaboring the point, let us note simply that the two statements are logically irreconcilable.

No doubt. As Groucho Marx once said, "These are my principles. And if you don't like them, I have others." The Times has developed great facility in compartmentalizing its principles.

Wiki tikki tavi

There's a lot that needs to be said about the materials now coming out because of Wikileaks, but I have two initial thoughts about the matter:

• First, we can no longer assume that anything is confidential in matters of State. Electronic communications don't live in diplomatic pouches and cannot be burned. That changes the nature of statesmanship and my fear is that candor will be increasingly short supply. There are times when you need to make private judgments, but it no longer seems possible to record those judgments. My guess is that makes the world a more dangerous place.
• There's a lot more to read, but my general impression is that most of the things we're learning are things we already suspected -- North Korea and Iran are working together, for example. What is surprising is that the Arab regimes seem to be genuinely alarmed about Iran in ways they've not stated publicly. The Jerusalem Post, among others, has noticed this, detailing some of the comments from the Saudis and Jordanians, among others. Will anything come of these revelations, beyond embarrassment?

Blood and Roses

(Photo: AP)

Enjoy it when you can, because it doesn't come very often. Barring something weird happening when the computers start belching things out, the Wisconsin Badgers are going to the Rose Bowl. A few thoughts on yesterday's 70-23 demolition of Northwestern and the Gophers winning back the Pig:

• Because the Badgers have suddenly become an offensive juggernaut for the first time in school history, there's been some talk about whether or not Bret Bielema is running up the score on teams. Having watched most of yesterday's game, I don't think so. The Badgers scored 70 primarily because Northwestern gave them the ball numerous times and couldn't tackle. Northwestern hasn't been a footwipe for a long time now but that was as bad a performance as I've seen from a squad wearing purple in a long time, especially on defense.


• As good as Montee Ball, James White and John Clay appear to be, one thing has become obvious as the season has gone on: the Badger offensive line is one of the best college lines I've ever seen. I would wager that Gabe Carimi, John Moffitt and Peter Konz will all be playing on Sundays in the future. And the scary part is that Josh Oglesby, who might be the most talented offensive lineman in Madison, hasn't even been playing this season.


• I think one thing that Bielema and offensive coordinator Paul Chryst did do consciously yesterday was showcase Badger quarterback Scott Tolzien. Tolzien was magnificent, throwing for 4 touchdown passes. There's a message there for the school that draws the Badgers in the Rose Bowl (most likely TCU): if you try to put 8 or 9 in the box to stop the run, you will pay.


• Meanwhile, you have to be happy for the Gophers, who salvaged something from an otherwise lost season by beating Iowa yesterday and reclaiming Floyd of Rosedale. Benster and I have given Gopher quarterback Adam Weber a lot of grief this year, mostly in jest, but it needs to be said: the kid has done a very good job in terrible circumstances. I suspect he'll get a chance to play on Sundays, because a guy who throws for over 11,000 yards in a college career has accomplished something. And kudos to Jeff Horton, the interim coach who led the Gophers to two more wins than his risible former boss did. I'm not sure who the Gophers will bring in next year, but they might do worse than keeping the interim guy.

Benster and D Pick Your Games -- Adam Weber and Chilly Disappear Edition

Thanksgiving is over, baybee! So we now return you to your regularly scheduled HYYYYYYPPPPPE!

Never seems to be in short supply around here, Grasshopper.

I'm like the Energizer Bunny, old dude -- I keep going and going and going. And I'm going to kick your butt a little further with picks shortly. You're okay with that, right?

Uh, no. But we'll see what happens.

Iowa Stanzis (-15 1/2) vs. Minnesota Golden Roadkill. It's the end of the line for Adam Weber, Gopher quarterback and garbageman supreme. I've heard rumors that he's in contention for a management trainee position with Waste Management, but he might want to waste a few years as an NFL backup before he becomes a minister of refuse. We've picked on Weber a lot here, but he's a guy you actually have to admire. He could have had Ricky Stanzi's job and probably would have played on New Year's Day a number of times, but he was loyal to the Gophers. That's cool. But it won't stop the Hawkeyes from thrashing him one last time, just for old time's sake. It's time for a touch of Gray -- Marqueis Gray, that is. Hayden Fry Nation 100, Roadkill 35.

Well, that was a touching sendoff for our friend and neighbor from Shoreview. I guess you Irondale guys have no love for a Mounds View grad! Anyway, the problem has never been Adam Weber. The problem is the carousel of coaches and systems he's had to endure the last four seasons. It might actually help him get a sniff with the NFL, because anyone who has had to learn so many systems should be able to learn an NFL system with ease. And I'd be happy to make six figures holding a clipboard. Iowa can forget the Big Ten title this year and they'll be in an ornery mood after what's happened lately. But at least there probably won't be any bad Iowa fan behavior in the restrooms at TCF Bank Stadium because they don't serve alcohol and it's outdoors. Iowa 34, Gophers 17.

Northwestern Wildcat Offense (+23) vs. Beloved Wisconsin Badgers. Meanwhile in Madison, the Badgers have some hope of smelling Roses. If they win and Ohio State doesn't lose to Meeshegan, the Badgers will likely be headed for Pasadena. That's pretty good incentive not to screw this one up. Northwestern is down one Dan Persa, who might have been the Big Ten Player of the Year had he not been injured a few weeks ago. Do you think a freshman quarterback will come into Madison and beat a Badger team that has been scoring points in huge bunches lately? The Badger offense reminds me of the Blitzkrieg, because they'll just run you over and Northwestern looks a lot like the Belgian countryside. Matt LePay Nation 101, Belgium 0.

I think the Badgers will face a little more resistance than the Wehrmacht did. But I don't see Northwestern doing much to stop Montee Ball or John Clay or James White. Pasadena, anyone? Wisconsin 49, Northwestern 21.

Minnesota Childress-Free Vikings (+1) vs. Washington Unacceptably High Federal Spending. Unfortunately, the election is now over so I can't make fun of politicians. But I can make fun of Donovan McNabb. So I wonder if the Chunky Soup Curse is finally catching up to McNabb. So here's the question for this game -- is Leslie Frazier auditioning for a 2011 job with the Vikings, or is Donovan McNabb? The Vikings like to take really old quarterbacks and play them, but I don't think Donovan McNabb isn't likely to get in trouble with his cell phone, so maybe the Vikings will take a pass. I was Brad Childress for Halloween once and no one knew who I was. Now no one cares who Brad Childress is, so I guess that's symbolic or something. Skins 20, Down Goes Frazier 19.

I don't know what to expect. It was weird listening to Leslie Frazier's press conference on the radio on Monday afternoon -- he sounds just like Tony Dungy. I don't know if he'll get the same results, though. Now that the Vikings are in the rear view mirror, I hope they play well and that ol' number 4 doesn't get seriously hurt. But I don't have a lot of inclination to care that much, either. It seems like the Vikings haven't won on the road since the Carter administration, so they'll lose again this week. But they'll probably play okay. Washington 24, Minnesota 21.

Glorious Green Bay Packers (+2) vs. Hotlanta Dirty Birds. Little known fact -- the last time the Packers played in Atlanta, they won behind the stellar play of Samkon Gado. No, really, it happened. That was back in 2005 when the Packers had their worst season in the last 20. Things look a lot different now. There's no Samkon Gado and the Falcons are a very different team, too. A good one, by the way. However, the Packers are playing like they did last year after that incident with the Creamsicles. Here's a bold prediction: Packers 27, Dirty Birds 24.

That is bold, Seasbiscuit. But I'm not sure that our boys can do it. I've been burned a few times picking against the Packers and probably should have learned. But I'm old and set in my ways, as my son is fond of pointing out. Hoping I'm wrong, but: Atlanta 31, Green Bay 24.

Yeah, I do not like Mounds View High School, so I'm probably a little harder on Adam Weber than some people are. But Adam Weber deserves better than what's he's had in his Gophers career. Ben out!

Benster and D Pick Your Thanksgiving Games -- Turkeys Everywhere You Look

Old dude, I think I've found the turkey already. It's E. Gordon Gee, who told us that he doesn't think much of Boise State and TCU. Here's what he said:

I do know, having been a Southeastern Conference president and a Big Ten president, that it's like Murderer's Row every week for these schools. We do not play the Little Sisters of the Poor. We play very fine schools on any given day. So I think that until a university runs through that gauntlet, that there's some reason to believe that they may not be the best teams to be in the big ball game.

I take it you disagree with that, youngblood.

Yes, Decrepit. So tell me who Ohio State played in non-conference games this year. I looked it up and they played Miami, which is a pretty tough opponent. But their other opponents include some real heavyweights, like Marshall, Ohio University and the dreaded Eastern Michigan. You know what two things those schools have in common, old dude?

They all wear green, I think.

Good for you, AARP-meister! But the other thing they have in common is this -- they stink! Boise beat Oregon State and Virginia Tech in non-conference play, and TCU beat Utah on the road. I don't see why E. Gordon Gee should get all gee-whiz about these fine non-BCS squads. And I'm confused -- why would a guy who was involved in Watergate be the president of Ohio State?

I think you're confusing E. Gordon Gee with G. Gordon Liddy. A common misperception.

Thank you for clearing that up, Bob Woodward! But the other thing I have to say to Gee is this: c'mon, man!

I admire your restraint.

Well, I turn on the HYYYYYYPPPPE when it's time to pick football games. So here it comes, baybee!

New England Belicheks (-6 1/2) vs. Motor City Kitties. Well it's that time of the year when the Lions go on national television and humiliate themselves. It's like being on Dancing with the Stars and not being able to dance. The Lions haven't won on Thanksgiving Day since 2003. Can they win today? No way. Plymouth Rock 35, Tame House Cats 0.

You know something? The Lions are getting better. They've played everyone tough this year and I expect they'll play the Patriots tough, too. I think the Lions are 7-3 against the point spread this year, even though they are 2-8. So let's say they beat the spread and lose the game. New England 28, Lions 24.

New Orleans Epic Fantasy League Quarterback Drew Breeses (-4) vs. Dallas How 'Bout Them Cowboahs. Wow, I'm almost out of breath after that intro! As you might guess, I have epic fantasy league quarterback Drew Brees on my squad, while Decrepit has Bobby Hebert, I think. He has a hard time keeping up on things, as you've probably noticed from his terrible picking this year. I've been surprised how Jason Garrett has been able to turn the ship around in Dallas. They are playing much better since they slunk out of Green Bay a few weeks back. But the Saints are only the defending Super Bowl Champions. That means something. The Saints also remember that the Cowboys beat them last year. The Saints won't be happy. Who Dat 70, Cowboahs 69.

No defense in Big D, you say? Could be. But I suspect that the Cowboys are going to give a good accounting of themselves. And they will win today. Dallas 31, New Orleans 23.

Au-barn War Eagle/Tigers/Cam Newton Payers (+4 1/2) vs. Alabama Crimson Tide. Now, I don't know for sure if Auburn paid Cam Newton to be their quarterback, but it's pretty clear that he's paid off for them thus far. But, this game is different. This is Alabama. This is Sparta! Alabama is second in the nation in passing defense and on offense they should try to eat up as much time as possible to keep Newton off the field. That is, if the NCAA doesn't get to him first. No BCS for you, Au-Barn! Roll Tide 17, Waaaar Eagle 13.

These teams hate each other. And everyone else hates them. Especially people in the Boise area. I agree with the young fella -- the Boise State Broncos are going to get their chance. Alabama wins. Alabama 24, Auburn 17.

Time to get some turkey! Ben out!

Guilty Pleasures Part Seventy-Three -- Thanksgiving Jones Edition

Fearless Maria is back and she's ready for action!

That's true, Dad. But I'm not like Alicia Bridges, who wanted Act-shone! Because my act, which is trying to be the coolest 10-year old girl in the blogosphere has been well shown! And I dress a lot better. At least I'm not wearing your Aunt Mabel's black curtains turned into running shorts. Wait, do you even have an Aunt Mabel?

Last time I checked, I didn't. I'm not sure where I'd get one, Maria.

Ooh, what a shame. So what are we going to for Guilty Pleasures? I wanted to do something about Thanksgiving, but I don't think Cold Turkey is appropriate for our vonderfull audience.

I agree -- the screaming at the end is likely to scare the customers.

You didn't hear that, everybody! He was talking about what the turkeys do on their way to the grocery store. No offense, turkeys. Thanksgiving is a bad day for turkeys, assuming they even make it that far.

Well, there are other things we could do, Maria.

Like what?

I've been doing something weird on Facebook this week, picking songs with Joneses in them.

Ooh, hint hint Facebook people! Which sadly, I am not one of yet. I'm sooo ready for social networking, Dad!

We'll take that conversation offline.

I know what that means! You won't talk to me about it at all! Avoiding the tiger!

Have you been eavesdropping in my office, Maria?

Well, you know at some point I wouldn't mind hearing what goes on in your office, rather than taking multiplication time tests.

I can see that. So let's run the musical numbers. First we'll go with this one. It's Boz Scaggs:

Lowdown

All right pardner, here is the Fearless Maria critiquing as I throw down on "Lowdown." Dad, doesn't that all white outfit remind of your Halloween outfit, where you dressed up in a hazmat suit, without all the magic marker we put on there? Gosh, I feel bad -- they brought in a full orchestra and they have to hide behind a curtain and a guy who looks like he fell into a bucket of white paint! Of course, I like the song, but my goodness, the outfits are a whole other story.

What's scary is this -- Maria. By the standards of the 1970s, what you saw was actually pretty stylish.

Wow -- that makes me wonder what's on the dark, shadowy horizon of 70s looks if that's supposed to be good. Dad, he was wearing Sansabelt slacks. I've been warned about those! In fact, all they need is one of those neon yellow caution signs for a construction site. Or maybe better, they could have the construction site use them to wipe off the white paint!

Well, let's try this one instead. This is Billy Paul, from late 1972:

Me and Mrs. Jones

Dad, did he borrow the orchestra from Boz Scaggs? That hat he's wearing looks like he made it from one of Mom's saucepans! Or maybe it's one of Mrs. Jones's saucepans and Mr. Jones hit him over the head with it because he found out what he was doing with Mrs. Jones! I think it's a pretty good song, but there sure seem to be a lot of questions going on here. Maybe they need to borrow 20 Questions from my teacher's game cabinet and stop meeting at the cafe. He has to be extra careful, you know.

Sounds like he could have saved himself some grief if he'd only talked to you first, Maria.

Well, that's my job here and he needs to accept the facts of the great big swirling sphere that we are standing on at the moment. Or at least move to Mars and face their facts. But I don't think they have any cafes on Mars, Dad.

Probably not. So anyway, here's another Jones thing from later in the 1970s. It's the Jam:

Smithers-Jones

All right, Jam -- it may seem that I'm putting you in the toaster here, but that's impossible because you're not on bread yet. You're very, very, very British-sounding; not that there's a problem with that but your voices and your style are coated in United Kingdomness. Dad told me that the Jam never did much in the United States and I can understand why -- because once again they didn't have bread. They probably had scones!

So you're saying that the Jam is not your cup of tea, Maria?

No, it's not my cup of tea, or coffee, or any other java jive because it doesn't love me, Dad! So who steps up next, because not everyone is a winner, but everybody pays the same price of FREE!

That's true -- no admission is charged here. So we can move forward to 1993 and these guys:

Mr. Jones

Dad, are you sure that's 1993? He's got one of those fringe jackets like they wore in the 1970s and he's got fringe hair, too! I know they're dreadlocks, but they certainly aren't a dreadlock holiday. Well, the song was okay, but I don't think they shouldn't count their crows before they hatch! That singer does look a little full of himself and I'm sure he'd be better off counting crows than eating crow! And his words.

Well, a lot of singers are full of themselves, Maria.

I know that, Dad. Waah waah waaaahhhh! It's really a shame, because some of them are probably perfectly good people, but it messes with their minds. They become super-egos. They were mesmerized in the false-tivity of the situation!

Huh?

I guess falsi-tivity isn't a word, Dad. It was only a dream that I would have been able to make my own word and contribute to etymology!

Etymology? How old are you?

Ten, Dad! What, a ten-year old can't use the word etymology? It was one of our spelling words a few weeks back, in the deep waters of my school.

Pretty deep, all right. Anyway, if you were wondering what the Counting Crows guy was talking about, he was talking about this song by Bob Dylan:

Ballad of a Thin Man

So, is the "Ballad of a Thin Man" what they play on the Wii Fit commercial? It was a pretty good song except I'm wondering, did they have to strangle some bluebirds to get that weird, high-pitched noise?

That's an organ, Maria.

Sounds like someone was getting bodily organs crushed, Dad! Really squeaky! Okay, I know it's like one of those organs that they have in bands or at church, but I don't think I've ever heard anyone at St. John's make it sound so squeaky and crushy!

It was the 1960s, Maria.

I know. And I'd have been worried for the sake of humanity and animal-anity back then. Good thing I wasn't born until 35 years later!

Well, the only way we can time travel is through these videos, Maria.

And you know what? YouTube isn't exactly as great as Albert Einstein, Dad! But speaking of time travel, it's time to vote! You can stay right here in our somewhat safe blogosphere generation, because it's my generation! And no, the people in the link aren't from my generation. Pick your favorite in the comment section, but don't smash any guitars!

An anniversary unremarked

Perhaps it's a good sign that I actually forgot to write this, but better late than never. Twenty years ago this month I made one of the best decisions of my life. I quit smoking.

I had become a smoker mostly because of the typically young adult lifestyle I was then leading. At some point I'd learned that you could get an extra jolt out of your beer buzz if you added a few smokes. Eventually I started smoking at times when I wasn't out socializing and by the time 1990 rolled around, I was smoking about a pack a day.

As it turned out, 1990 was a pretty eventful year. Mrs. D and I were on the path to marriage and I formally proposed to her at the beginning of August. Less than a month later, my dad passed away. Dad would fire up a cigar from time to time but wasn't a regular smoker, but his premature demise certainly got my attention.

At the time I quit, a pack of cigarettes would set you back about $1.50 to $1.75, depending on where you bought them. I usually got mine at the little neighborhood store a block from my apartment, so I typically paid a little more. It wasn't a huge expense but it was adding up and there wasn't much that I enjoyed about smoking. Mrs. D had said she would marry me if I were still a smoker, but that she wasn't crazy about the idea of having children breathing cigarette smoke. So it was time.

I decided to quit over a weekend and we arranged to get out of town. Smoking is a matter of habit in more ways than one and breaking the normal routine was key. The other key was making it difficult to light up the cigarette. Late that Friday night, I was having a cigarette on the back steps of the apartment building. A guy was walking down the alley and saw me. He asked me if I had a light.

I told him I did and tossed him my lighter. Then I told him to keep it. "I want to quit smoking, so I won't need this." The guy thanked me and went on his way. And that was that.

The weekend wasn't pleasant, since the withdrawal is unpleasant. But quitting cold turkey was the way to go. By the time the weekend was over, the cravings had subsided a bit. I had put the ashtrays away and I'd thrown away the last few cigarettes that had been in my pack. I got up on Monday morning and went to work a former smoker. And I haven't gone back to it.

I realize that for many people, quitting smoking is very difficult. But it can be done. And I think the most important thing you can do to quit smoking is to make it difficult to light a cigarette. If you have to make an effort to light up a smoke, you have enough time to fight off the urge. Don't carry a lighter and get rid of your matches. And most of all, don't stop trying to quit. You can do it.

Just so we're clear

The point of contesting the results of the election isn't to stop Mark Dayton from being governor. He's going to become governor. The point of the exercise is to show how he became governor and the things that some people have done to ensure it would happen.

Eyeballs

Over at MinnPost, David Brauer asks and answers a question:

First, the question, prompted by Twittering:

The argument goes something like this: the local sportsfolk haven't broken the biggest Vikings stories this year, including Brett Favre's return, the Randy Moss trade, and now, Chili's firing. Depending on how you parse out credit, the scoops belonged to ESPN, the NFL Network and Fox Sports. So why should, say, the Strib have three guys working the Vikings/NFL beat when they can't bring home the biggest stories — especially when less sexy but more important news beats have one or no reporters?

Brauer's take on the matter of scoops, which I find persuasive:

The locals are getting beat by national outlets that pay the NFL millions for TV rights (ESPN/Fox) or those owned directly by the league (NFL Network). Say all you want about "mainstream" organizations paying for news, but I have to believe this is a factor. There's a substantial business relationship here.

Of course this is true and anyone who thinks otherwise isn't thinking the matter through. Guys like Ed Werder of ESPN and Jay Glazer at Fox have a much larger platform than someone like Judd Zulgad of the Star Tribune. Given the egos involved, it makes sense to talk first to the guy with the bigger blowtorch, as they say in the radio business.

What is even more silly is the notion that somehow devoting more beat writers to sports is a bad thing for a local newspaper to do. Brauer:

If the Strib suddenly got religion on sports and cut the staff, would they shift money over to news? Perhaps, but not as much as you might think.

At least on the newspaper side, sports is a major driver of readership. Brett Favre's '09 return produced the biggest traffic day in Startribune.com history. Most of that may have been "drive-by" traffic that produces tenths of pennies per click. But over time, being the "go-to" local sports platform adds up. How many of you keep your subscription to luxuriate over the sports pages after a big win?

I think this is correct. Almost no one on my street takes the paper anymore, but people still want to have a copy of the paper when there's a big sports story. Newspapers barber a lot about public service, but at bottom they are for-profit corporations and the key thing is to make money. While there may be enough interesting things going on at Minneapolis City Hall to merit an additional reporter, the folks hanging out at Winter Park are the ones who deliver the most eyeballs.

Chilly we hardly knew ye

So, will Brett Favre give Chilly a ride to the airport?

Okay, I'll admit I stole that line from a friend of mine, but it kinda sums things up. As you've probably heard, the Vikings gassed Brad Childress this morning and have named Leslie Frazier as the interim coach. A few thoughts:

• I wrote about Favre this morning and really don't have a lot to add about his situation, except to say that he's been pretty rough on those who would coach him in recent years. His antics probably got Eric Mangini fired in New York and now Brad Childress lost his job.
• I've spoken with any number of Vikings fans about Childress and while their has been almost universal disgust with his tenure, I'm not convinced that his coaching has been that bad, really. He'd done a very good job of identifying good players and deploying them in positions where they could succeed. If you look at the Vikings roster now and compare it to 2005, when Mike Tice was ashcanned, you will notice that nearly the entire roster has turned over. The results got steadily better for the first four years of the Childress regime, but at the end things went south. While I think you can put a lot of that on Childress and a fair amount on Favre, I think there's plenty of blame to go around.
• When we get a little distance from things, I suspect that the failed Randy Moss experiment will turn out to be crucial, but not necessarily for the reasons we have thought. Moss has his flaws, but there's evidence that he's actually a pretty shrewd fellow -- our friend Night Writer has said as much in the past. I think you could argue that Moss sized up the situation here and forced his way out precisely because he saw the dysfunction. He didn't want to be part of it and knew exactly how to extricate himself.
• Leslie Frazier gets the job on an interim basis and a thankless job it is. He's been loyal to Childress, which makes me wonder how easy it will be for him to distance himself from what's been happening this season. The word on Frazier is that he's exceptionally bright and patient, which are admirable traits. My guess is that this team, as it is currently, needs someone who's not afraid to kick some butts. Perhaps Frazier can do that but one has to wonder.
• As a Packer fan, what's been most interesting is that we've now seen teams fire their coaches in consecutive games after getting whipped by the boys in Green. It's a coincidence, but I think one thing has been clear -- the reason the Packers are still hanging in there while their opponents fade away is that the Packers do a good job of policing egos. Unlike the Vikings or the Cowboys, the Packers show up and do their work every week without a lot of talking. That's a testament to the approach that permeates the team from top to bottom. Mike McCarthy is a thoroughly dull dude but he's obviously able to keep the drama in check. It seems to be a rare skill set.
  

The Limits of Schadenfavre

As a Packer fan, there's no disputing that I enjoyed every minute of the 31-3 drubbing they inflicted upon the Minnesota Vikings yesterday at Har-Mar, er I mean Mall of America Field. After a bit of a slow start, Aaron Rodgers was masterful and the Packer defense was generally quite effective in slowing down what is left of the Minnesota offense. Good show.

And yet, and yet -- there's something a little hollow in watching Brett Favre turn into Willie Mays in a Mets uniform. Yes, the Favre act has gotten even older than he is and yes, the Vikings are getting what they deserved for believing that a once-in-a-lifetime series of events could be replicated.

Still, I don't feel any great joy in Favre's comeuppance. His performances have absolutely vindicated the decisions that Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy made in 2008, when they decided to turn over control of the Packers to Rodgers. Still, I continue to believe that Favre's departure could have been handled with a little more grace.

Favre, for all his faults, was the face the of the Packers for 16 seasons. Aside from Curly Lambeau or Vince Lombardi, no one other individual has represented the team in such a public way in its history. He did lead the team to a stretch of enormous success and won a lot of games for four very different coaches in his tenure. He made the Packers a team the nation wanted to watch again, putting the lie to the sneering of national observers like Frank Deford, who declared the Packers dead and irrelevant in the 1980s. It would be churlish to forget the role Favre has had in making Packer football both relevant and enjoyable.

At one point in yesterday's broadcast, the cameras turned to Chuck Foreman, the great old Viking runner of the 1970s, who disappointed me by whipping up on the Packers regularly during my childhood. I was watching the game with the Benster and told him about my memories of Chuck Foreman. It occurs to me that Benster has never felt the despair of knowing his team cannot compete. More than anyone else, Brett Favre is the reason for that.

And while I always prefer the Packers to the Vikings, I live in Minnesota. The Vikings are, for better or worse, the team that generates the most passion in these parts and while it pains me to admit it, I think that most Vikings fans understand the game well and are actually pretty reasonable. The mood of this place is always better when the Vikings are winning -- it's almost palpable. With the onset of an early winter that is suggesting ferocity, it's been a depressing week in Minnesota and the long winter the Vikings have delivered doesn't help the mood. My own personal happiness aside, there's no joy in that.

Benster and D Pick Your Games -- Old Man and Bartman Edition

So I'm going to be a year older this weekend. You know that I'm going to be feeling some HYYYYYYYPPPPPPE!

Yes, that's correct. Happy almost 15th birthday, young fella! How did you get so old, anyway?

It's not like I had a choice, Decrepit! But you know what is the best part about being an adolescent?

I'm sure you'll tell me.

Well, yeah. I get to be adolescent! Yeah, baybee! That means it's time to lay down some smack and pick some games. Did you notice that I was almost right with my Badger pick last week? Well, didya? Ha-ha!

That turned out okay. Good thing that the Badgers were playing a team that didn't bother to play defense.

Lotta that thing going around, old dude. Watch me work. . . .

Beloved Wisconsin Badgers (-4) vs. Meeshegan Hail to the Vanquished. I would not expect Michigan to just lay down and die like Indiana did last week, but they play defense like France. Do you know why they planted trees along Division Street in Ann Arbor? So that Brett Bielema could walk in the shade! I think we need more Nelson Muntz. The Badgers win by keeping Denard Robinson standing on the sidelines, next to RichRod. BadgerBadgerBadger 30, Meeshegan 17.

I think I understand your theory and it's a good one, youngblood. If the Badgers can play ball control and score touchdowns, Michigan has no shot. I think it won't be easy, since the Badgers haven't won in Ann Arbor in your lifetime, Seabiscuit. But that streak comes to an end tomorrow afternoon. Badgers 38, Michigan 27.

Illinois Fighting Zooks (-7 1/2) vs. Northwestern Wildcat Offense, at Wrigley Field in Chicago. So this is a strange thing, AARP wannabe -- the Wildcats gave up a home game to play at Wrigley. The last time a college game took place in Wrigley, I think it involved either the University of Chicago or a joust. It's been a loooong time, Decrepit! But I'm sure this guy was there. Lemme hear ya! No, I'd rather not, Harry. There's a problem with playing at Wrigley. Because one end zone is about two feet from the right field wall, they are concerned about safety and will have to do some switching around to handle plays in the end zone. Maybe they're afraid that this guy will show up. None of this has much to do with football, but let's face it, tormenting Cubs fans never gets old! Maybe I'd better stay clear of the North Side. As for the game, it's tough for Northwestern since they lost their star quarterback. The Zooks got embarrassed by our Gophers last week and they'll be angry and on the warpath. Chief Illiniwek 100, Steve Bartman Nation 0.

I dimly remember watching Da Bearz play at Wrigley when I was a kid and I don't remember the right field wall being a problem. Then again, the Bears had a hard time scoring in those days and the end zone was mostly a rumor to them. I think Northwestern is a better team if they have Dan Persa. But they don't. So I'll agree with the birthday boy. Illinois 27, Northwestern 23.

The Ohio State University Buckeyes (-3) vs. Iowa Hawkeyes. I still think Iowa fans worship Hayden Fry. They probably have some temple out in a cornfield some place. Since it's Iowa, that doesn't really narrow down a location, though. Maybe it's in Kankakee? No wait, that's Illinois. Maybe it's in Keokuk. But no matter where they keep the secret temple of Fry, the Hawkeyes will need to get someone better than Ricky Stanzi as their quarterback. He's just good enough to lose. Iowa should play their hearts out and it will be enough to overcome the Stanzi Factor and squeak by. Temple of Hayden 10, Brutus Buckeye 9.

I don't know what to think, although I'd suggest a game of Scrabble between Iowa wideout Derrell Johnson-Koulianos and OSU flanker Dane Sanzenbacher. Long names, good games. I think OSU wins because they're just a better team, but I thought the same thing about Michigan State. Oh well, we'll take our chances. Ohio State 27, Iowa 20.

Glorious Green Bay Packers (-3) vs. Minnesota Turmoils. So I heard they changed the name of the Vikings pre-game television show to "All My Childress," in honor of the soap opera going on at Winter Park. I obviously want the Packers to win this game really badly, since it falls on my birthday. Did I mention my birthday? Did I? The Vikings are like the Titanic about a half hour after they've hit the iceberg. They still think they're on the Love Boat, but noooo! Favre sees his old team for likely the last time, unless he changes his mind and signs on with Lions. The problem is, about the only team that will want him are these Lions. I also would not be surprised if Favre gets the number 52 implanted on his chest courtesy of the Claymaker. However, I am worried that Chad Clifton won't be able to hear the snap count and we might have to put about six tight ends on the side with Jared Allen. Verde Bay 30, All My Childress 0.

Oh, I think the old guy has a little something left over for my beloved Packers. It's going to be tough. I think the key is stopping Percy Harvin. If the Packers keep him from going nuts, the Vikings go down easily. If not, watch out. Packers 27, Vikings 24.

Motor City Kitties (+6 1/2) vs. Dallas Cowboahs. So I'm confused, old dude -- the Cowboys who came up to Green Bay, they weren't the same guys who were in New Jersey last week. I know Wade Phillips was channeling his inner Tim Brewster, but what gives? I wonder which team is going to show up? Bet Jerry Jones does, too. As for the Kitties, Matthew Stafford is now as likely to play quarterback for the Lions as Jim Stafford. Since the game is in Dallas and not Branson, I'm going to pick the Cowboys. Cowboy Up 3, Tame House Cats 2.

Think you're in the wrong ballpark there, Grasshopper. This game doesn't involve the Rangers as far as I know. I saw enough of the Cowboy game last week to be very confused, too. There's no way they should have dominated the Giants, but they did. Go figure! As for the Lions, it's clear they are a better team now but without Stafford they'll have trouble scoring. Your instincts are correct on this one, but in football the scores go up by 3s and 7s, so: Cowboys 14, Lions 13.

Indianapolis Mannings (+3 1/2) vs. New England Bradys. How can Peyton Manning win with guys I've never heard of playing receiver? He's some kind of genius. The problem is that the Patriots have some geniuses, too. And better talent. I'm also very fond of saying Benjarvis Green-Ellis. No doubt that the Patriots remember how the last game ended and will try to keep Manning off the field. Brady's Bunch 24, Peyton Place 7.

I have nothing to support this pick other than a hunch. So I'll just make the pick. Colts 28, Patriots 17.

Favre is old. The Ghost of Bartman is out and about. It's cold outside. And it's my birthday. Did I mention that it's my birthday? I must have said something about it. ¡Feliz cumpleaños a Ben! ¡Feliz cumpleaños a Ben! Ben out!

The Lights Go Out at TvM

It appears that my friend Gary Miller has pulled the plug on Truth vs. the Machine, which was until recently one of the key blogs on the starboard side of the Minnesota blogosphere. Gary hadn't been doing much with the blog and the other writers Gary had assembled were contributing less frequently, so it makes sense that it would quietly die.

TvM started out as a blog dedicated to following the election cycle in 2006, which was not an easy thing to do. It paid special attention to the travails of Mark Kennedy, the Republican congressman who ended up losing badly to Amy Klobuchar in the race to replace Mark Dayton in the Senate. Gary assembled some really talented people to write at the blog and it was a lively place, even as it became clear that candidate Kennedy was going nowhere. I'd argue that what was then called "Kennedy vs. the Machine" was better than Kennedy.

After the election, TvM became a place where good local conservative writers had a chance to discuss the topics of the day, but it was more than that. It was a lot of fun. Jeff Kouba provided excellent commentary on the travails of the television show "24," while Gary's brother, writing under the name "Carnivore," provided top-notch discussions of all things gun. And over the years Gary had some really outstanding talent from the local blogosphere on his team, including Doug Williams, Andy Aplikowski, Kouba, First Ringer, Pat Shortridge and Steam Valve. This was a heck of a roster and while the voices on the blog varied, they shared a sensibility that I found appealing -- they were quite serious about the issues, but no one who wrote for TvM in any of its incarnations took himself (or herself) too seriously. Gary even let me play in his sandbox, which was a great opportunity.

As Gary's day job and other responsibilities changed, I'm sure it was tough to devote the time needed to maintain the blog. These days most of Gary's creativity is channeled into his Facebook account and he has thousands of friends. It's no surprise -- he's still deadly serious about his faith and family, but his foray into social networking is usually hilarious, especially his dispatches from "Farmville," which are a bit like Hunter S. Thompson visiting Petticoat Junction.

Blogs come and go -- you have to be a bit of an obsessive to face the blank screen every day and bang something out, especially if you want to get past the received wisdom. While it was in its heyday, TvM was first-rate precisely because it wasn't about received wisdom. While I'll miss TvM, it served its purpose and served it well. Thanks, Gary.

Cry Me a (Hudson) River

Charlie Rangel ponders his mortality:

“I don’t know how much longer I have to live,” said Mr. Rangel, 80, his eyes watery and his voice quivering. But, he said, whatever time he has, he will spend it trying “to help people and thank God for what he’s given to me.”

Why the look back in sorrow? Because he's going to be censured for a variety of sins.

A censure would mark a momentous downfall for Mr. Rangel, a Democrat who for 40 years has represented Harlem, where he was born. As a decorated Korean War veteran and civil rights advocate, he became a combative and irrepressible voice for liberal causes and, in 2007, snared one of the most powerful positions in Congress, the chairmanship of the Ways and Means Committee.

Censure requires approval by the full House, which plans to take up the matter after its Thanksgiving recess.

If, as expected, censure is approved, Mr. Rangel will be the first member to receive such punishment since 1983, when two congressmen were rebuked for sexual misconduct with House pages. Mr. Rangel would be required to stand in the well of the House while the speaker reads a resolution rebuking him.

I'd prefer Rangel to stand on the steps of the Capitol and announce his resignation, but that's likely too much to ask. Rangel has a lot in common with another decorated veteran who disgraced himself in Congress, John Murtha. Murtha died earlier this year and never ended up facing an ethics panel, but there were more than a few scandals that had surfaced with his name on them. If he hadn't died on the operating table, there was a pretty good chance he'd have faced the same fate as Charlie Rangel.

The problem is incumbency. You end up with people like Rangel, who was in position for 40 years. John Dingell has been in Congress for well over 50 years. No one should hold office that long, Republican or Democrat. The longer you spend in the artificial environment of the Capitol, where lobbyists ply you and sycophants tell you how great you are, the more likely you are to lose sight of why you were sent there in the first place. Public service and self-service are often hard to separate, especially for someone who has spent most of their life in Congress.

If Charlie Rangel is sincere about trying to help people, he ought to go back to Harlem and dig in. Surely there is someone else who can do his job.

83-20, 7-52 and 0-56

I did most of my growing up in the 1970s, which was generally a bad time for a Wisconsin Badger football fan. While the Badgers had some fairly remarkable players on their rosters in those days, it was always safe to assume that the best result the Badgers could expect was a 4th place finish in the Big Ten. The best team the Badgers had in that era was probably the 1974 squad, which beat Nebraska and finished 7-4 overall. Even so, they got their butts handed to them when the went to Columbus, losing to Ohio State 52-7. A few years later in 1977, the Badgers went into Ann Arbor sporting a 5-0 record and ended up getting edged by Michigan 56-0.

There were a lot of scores of that sort back then. Things have been very different in Madison over the last 20 years since Barry Alvarez came to town and changed the culture completely. This season's squad is 9-1 under the direction of Brett Bielema and has been accused of running up the score, especially after last weekend's 83-20 demolition of a hapless Indiana squad. As a Badger fan, this is a strange sensation.

I watched the last part of the game on Saturday, especially the 4th quarter. It was a lot like watching Benster play Madden '10 on the Wii -- the Indiana team was only making a cursory effort and the Badgers were able to move the ball virtually at will. The most bored man in the stadium had to be the Badger punter, who never had to practice his craft, since the Badgers scored every time they had the ball. Is it bad sportsmanship to score when the other team is laying down?

The question of running up the score is out there because of something that happened earlier in the season, when the Badgers were leading the Minnesota Gophers by 25 points and Bielema went for a 2-point conversion. This move aroused the ire of then-Gopher coach Tim Brewster, who complained quite loudly about the matter to anyone who would listen. Two things were at work -- Bielema and Brewster had a contentious relationship because of their recruiting battles and Brewster realized that his job tenure was in serious jeopardy. While I understand why Bielema might have wanted to rub Brewster's nose in it a little, I wish he hadn't done it. And Bielema's explanation for why he did it (the coaches' card said to) was silly. Brewster got the ax a few weeks later and his team's performance against Wisconsin had a lot to do with his dismissal.

I don't think this week's accusations were fair, since Indiana seemed almost indifferent to their fate. I also find it troubling that some of the critics, especially Mike Golic of ESPN, weighed in even though they hadn't bothered to watch film of the game. The problem for the Badgers is this: once you get a reputation for poor sportsmanship, even if it's for specious reasons, it follows you.

Bielema isn't really old enough to remember the events 1974 or 1977, or much care about that ancient history. Fans do remember, though. And while it's gratifying that the Badgers are now a consistently good program, it's easy enough to imagine a day when 0-56 results return.

And now, the news

I was going to give outgoing WCCO-TV news anchor Don Shelby a little shot before he left, but Brian "St. Paul" Ward has already done the work over at Fraters. A representative sample:

More to the point, the idea that he was regularly grilling the "powerful" from behind his desk and teleprompter is laughable. I suppose 30 years ago when he started he may have been holding powerful people's feet to the fire.

These days, the man who became known as "DFL Don" is more likely to be holding powerful people like Minneapols Mayor RT Rybak not accountable, but sweetly in his arms while laughing and performing at a fundraiser for a liberal news web site.

Just so. I stopped watching WCCO after Shelby's self-importance became too much to bear, especially his commentaries, where he comes off as Ted Baxter with a slightly better vocabulary.

It shouldn't surprise anyone that self-importance is a trait of anyone who thinks they ought to appear on television. Some people eventually get beyond that. When I was in college there was a hotshot news anchor who came on the air at a Green Bay television station. The guy's name is Tom Zalaski and he started at WBAY television not long after Shelby began at WCCO. At first it was obvious that Zalaski was thinking Green Bay was just a stepping stone and that he was bound for glory, or at least a larger market. In his initial broadcasts the condescension in his voice was almost palpable as he discussed the latest drunken domestic dispute in Bonduel or kicked it over to Carmen Winkler in the "Lakeshore Bureau" for a dispatch on a barn fire outside of Two Rivers.

But a funny thing happened; we'll let Zalaski tell the story:

I came to Green Bay at age 25, telling myself I would stay here for one year and then it was off to the 'Big Time'. Now, 25 years later I realize how blessed I am to have stayed. There is nothing more important one can provide for his family than quality of life. In that respect, Green Bay is the Big Time.

Zalaski raised a family in Green Bay and lost his wife to cancer in the 1990s. He did move from WBAY to WFRV, but that was the only change he made. Although I don't know the particulars of Zalaski's career, he most likely had opportunities to go someplace else. He was at least as professional a news reader as anyone currently working in the Twin Cities. It would have been easy enough to imagine Zalaski landing a job at one of WCCO's competitors; after all, Zalaski's former colleague Joe Schmit got out of Green Bay and ended up here. But Tom Zalaski realized something important, something that I rarely see in other television personalities -- it really isn't about you.

The last time I was back in the Valley, I caught Zalaski on a newscast. While he was the same guy I'd seen all those years ago, he wasn't the brash, almost-smartass broadcaster he'd been in the 1980s. He seemed content to tell people what was going on without adornment or puffery. He didn't feel any need to opine or tell us What It All Means. He trusted that his audience would be able to figure things out without any prompting. Somewhere along the way Tom Zalaski learned to trust the intelligence of his audience and stopped sneering at barn fire reporting. I wish more people in the news gathering business felt the same way.

A tale of leadership

So it turns out that Paul Ryan has had precisely one more conversation with Nancy Pelosi than I have:

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the incoming chairman of the House Budget Committee, suggested Republicans get along best with [Steny] Hoyer, the second-ranking House Democrat who will stay in the No. 2 position in the next Congress."

I get along pretty well with Steny. He's the only one we really talk to," Ryan said Monday morning on CNBC. "I don't know Nancy Pelosi. I had a 30-second conversation with her about six years ago, and that's about it."

That's pretty astonishing if you think about it. Ryan isn't a backbencher; of all the younger Republicans who have emerged in the last decade, he might be the most impressive of the lot. You would think that Pelosi would at least have wanted a little insight into what someone like Ryan is thinking.

I remain convinced that hubris had a lot to do with what happened to the Democrats in this cycle. Nancy Pelosi has long been able to operate without any effective opposition -- she represents an utterly safe congressional district and because of the institutional setup of the House, she could operate however she pleased. Lord Acton warned about this sort of thing.

Lightning Round - 111510

Have to go fast again this a.m.:

• There's been an amazing amount of ink spilled and pixels deployed to discuss the ongoing saga in Winter Park, which someone on Facebook called "All My Childress." I think we can stop now. As Eliot put it, this is the way the world ends, not with a bang but a whimper. Or with a Hank Baskett sighting.
• More of a question than anything else, especially for my fellow cheeseheads: were you in any way troubled seeing the Badgers put up 83 points on hapless Indiana? I saw the last quarter of the game and it didn't seem like the Badgers were trying to run up the score, but you have to wonder. My sense is that because of the current system (that being the odious BCS), it's almost obligatory to start stomping your opponents as hard as possible to please the computers.
• A little intramural political fun from Missouri: Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) warned Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) of "disloyalty" to President Obama if she should seek to distance herself from the White House in her re-election campaign. Cleaver, who's seen as the likely next leader of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), cautioned the centrist senator of distancing herself from Obama, the way many endangered incumbents had done in the closing weeks of the 2012 election. “Any attempt to extricate herself from him will be an act of disloyalty,” Cleaver told McClatchy in a piece profiling McCaskill's re-election campaign. “She will not do that at all.” I don't think Cleaver understands that McCaskill faces a little different electorate than he does, even though they're from the same state. Not that I have a lot of sympathy for McCaskill, who was highly fortunate to run for office in 2006. Things change.

Snowmageddon and Its (Dis)contents

It snowed a little here in the Twin Cities yesterday...OK, it snowed quite a bit. While this was happening, I noticed something that I have noticed many times before, but couldn't put my finger on how to describe it. I find that snow has an infantilzing effect on us. It manifested itself nicely, in writing, on Facebook. Some of the status updates I saw yesterday:

"IT'S SNOWING!!!!!! YEAH!!"
"I hate snow."
"SNOW!! Keep it coming!"
"Dumb snow."
"Time to go play in the snow!!"

Now, I expressed a wish for it to be snowing bacon...mostly because this snowstorm threatened an annual celebration of bacon I have with some of my coworker friends. Worry not, dear readers, for it went off without a hitch (other than depressed attendance).

I tend to come down on the not-a-fan-of-snow side of things, especially a big snowstorm before Thanksgiving. But, it's funny how the first snowfall of the season makes us act like children. Whether we like snow or not, we kinda spaz out. All of those status quotes are from adults, many of whom are pretty respectable, mature people. But, here we are, throwing child-like temper tantrums because we have to shovel/drive/walk in it, or conversely, getting overly excited because we, even though we are adults, want to run around and play in it.

So, yeah snow or nay snow, our reactions to it are very interesting. Very child-like.