Sunday, January 26, 2014

No, you'd rather have light rail, got it?

I wrote yesterday about the proposed metro-wide tax grab to pay for the Southwest light rail line. Not surprisingly, as a moss-backed right winger-type I'm agin' it. Not all of my reasons are because I'm Opposed to Progress, though. Here's another reason:
A recent study by IHS Automotive predicted that nearly every car on the road in 2050 will be self-driving; in that kind of world, in which our nation’s highways are populated by hordes of self-driving vehicles packed tightly together at higher speeds and with greater fuel efficiency, massive investments in rail infrastructure or new bus networks won’t make much sense. But these investments are already being made in places like California, which is already massively over-budget on a high-speed rail project that will be obsolete from its first day of operation.
The future that Walter Russell Mead and his colleagues at the American Interest envision would include a fleet of driverless cars that would be used for public transportation, as well as private use. Of course, that's a threat to transit agencies:
This isn't an entirely silly question in 2014. We make billion-dollar investments in new transit infrastructure because we expect to use it for decades. Metropolitan planning organizations are in the very business of planning 30 and 40 years into the future. The Washington Area Metropolitan Transit Authority recently released its dream map of subway service in the city for the year 2040. By then, autonomous cars – in some form – will surely be commonplace.

The question of what they'll mean for transit was actually on the program this year at the Transportation Research Board annual meeting in Washington, where several thousand transportation officials and researchers met to talk about state-of-the-art asphalts, biker behavior, and the infrastructure of the future. In one packed session, I heard Jerome Lutin, a retired longtime New Jersey Transit planner, say something that sounded almost like blasphemy.

"We’re just wringing our hands, and we’re going to object to this," he warned the room. "But the transit industry needs to promote shared-use autonomous cars as a replacement for transit on many bus routes and for service to persons with disabilities."
Like the Washington Area Metropolitan Transit Authority, our Met Council has big plans for a future that may not arrive. Despit that, the Met Council fully intends to implement those plans. Back to Mead:
The pace of technological progress is accelerating, and city planners can’t keep up. Self-driving cars are the latest and greatest transportation option, but who can guess what will replace them in the coming decades? A nation criss-crossed with Hyperloops? Ubiquitous telepresence technology? In this respect, we’re more uncertain about the future than we ever have been, and that’s a huge problem for those making decisions about public transit. One thing is obvious, though: we shouldn’t be building for the future with technology that’s already outdated. Looking at you California.
Looking at you, too, Met Council.

3 comments:

jerrye92002 said...

Considering that light rail "investments" have a NEGATIVE return on capital, taking out a "mortgage" to pay for building these monstrosities that will be obsolete before the mortgage is even nominally "paid off" seems doubly stupid. Oh-- government program, so duh.

Benster said...

Goverments are looking at this light rail/streetcar project because what young people are wanting to move into the cities. But what doesn't make sense is that the state is paying for this. I bet the outcry would not be as big if Minneapolis was paying for this. The line does not make sense. What would be a better use of the state funding would be to extend Northstar to St. Cloud or to make sure it can link up with Metro Transit.

I am puzzled why I am not an elected official. I at least have some sense in the matter.

jerrye92002 said...

If you are going to expect good sense in the making of public policy, you're never going to understand it. It's "social engineering," and it's for your own good. What doesn't make sense is that, for the cost of Light Rail, the State (or City) could run a fleet of low-emission hybrid busses up and down the University line, every two minutes, for the next 700 years! And, if need arose, some of those routes could change.