Of course
it's a scam:
As a result of political horse trading at UN negotiations on climate change, countries like Russia and the Ukraine were allowed to create carbon credits from activities like curbing coal waste fires, or restricting gas emissions from petroleum production. Under the UN scheme, called Joint Implementation, they then were able to sell those credits to the European Union’s carbon market. Companies bought the offsets rather than making their own more expensive, emissions cuts.
But this study, from the Stockholm Environment Institute, says the vast majority of Russian and Ukrainian credits were in fact, “hot air” – no actual emissions were reduced.
And the beauty part? Even more gas:
According to a study released in the journal Nature Climate Change, plants in Russia “increased waste gas generation to unprecedented levels once they could generate credits from producing more waste gas,” resulting in an increase in emissions as large as 600 million tons of carbon dioxide—roughly half the amount the EU’s ETS intends to reduce from 2013 to 2030.
Working great. Maybe that's why you aren't seeing any calls to have the climate summit grandees meet on Skype -- they aren't serious about any of it.
As one of the co-authors of the report put it, issuing these credits “was like printing money.”
Perhaps when this all goes south, they can work for the Fed.
1 comment:
One of the things I'd love to see is someone who admits the controversy, but simply notes that since weather changes, and climate changes (medieval optimum, little ice age, etc..), we might do well to design policy to be able to cope with either warming or cooling.
Probably making too much sense here. Sorry.
Post a Comment