Tuesday, December 22, 2009

12th of 10 - Which Way to Go?

As we discussed before, the Big Ten conference is thinking about expansion again. Last week I suggested a few potential candidates and asked the vast Dilettante readership to weigh in. Based on my initial suggestions and the deep thoughts of my well-respected readers, our list appears as follows:

Notre Dame
Pittsburgh
Rutgers
Syracuse
Iowa State
Missouri
Nebraska
Texas
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
Kansas
Boise State (from Night Writer)
Cal Poly (from a wise-guy anonymous commenter, likely from the Fox River Valley)

I'm guessing the Cal Poly suggestion was tongue-in-cheek, so we'll set it aside.

Here's what I think.

First, the Big Ten is rightly proud of its academics. It is the only major conference in which every member school is also a member of the Association of American Universities, a consortium of the top research universities in the country. I would be shocked if the Big Ten chose any school that is not also an AAU member. As a result, I am highly confident that Night Writer's bold suggestion of Boise State will have zero chance of going forward.

So if we look at the rest of the schools on the initial list, we see that all of the schools except Notre Dame and Kentucky are AAU schools. Notre Dame is a special case but has already rejected membership in the Big Ten, so I do not think it will be offered a second chance. It's difficult to see the advantage of bringing Kentucky into the league, either. So the list would be as follows:

Pittsburgh (Big East)
Rutgers (Big East)
Syracuse (Big East)
Iowa State (Big XII)
Missouri (Big XII)
Nebraska (Big XII)
Texas (Big XII)
Kansas (Big XII)
Vanderbilt (SEC)

I would also suggest three other AAU members who might fit, all from the ACC:

Duke
Maryland
Virginia

What I suspect is this: the Big Ten would like to add a school that fits academically. It also wouldn't mind hurting one of its rival conferences by taking away a prominent school. But ultimately this is about one thing: football.

A few weeks back, the nation's attention was focused on the SEC and Big XII championship games. These games determined the participants in the BCS championship game. The Big Ten's season was over a month ago.

While the Big Ten cherishes its academic standards, it also wants to win championships. Adding the right team would allow the conference to have a championship game and to get into the mix for the BCS. And that is why the teams on the list are the most likely candidates to join. But which one? I'll address that tomorrow.

3 comments:

Night Writer said...

What? The Big 10 And A Half can't give Boise State a football scholarship to join while turning a benign eye to Minnesota imposing political litmus tests for degrees in education? Whatever.

I don't see Mizzou or any top Big 12 school giving up it's already established and profitable league championship and games against tradtional rivals Kansas, Oklahoma and Nebraska (and a regular head-butt with Texas) just for the chance to slap Michigan and Ohio State around and to replace Iowa State with Iowa. Another neighbor, Illinois, would be in the league but Mizzou already plays Illinois on a somewhat regular basis. Perhaps Iowa State could be lured into the league as that would probably improve their record by two wins a year.

Mr. D said...

I don't see Mizzou or any top Big 12 school giving up it's already established and profitable league championship and games against traditional rivals Kansas, Oklahoma and Nebraska (and a regular head-butt with Texas) just for the chance to slap Michigan and Ohio State around and to replace Iowa State with Iowa.

I agree. But it's the university presidents who make these decisions and their calculations are different than the ones you or I might make. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.